LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K153753
    Device Name
    TelioCAD Multi
    Manufacturer
    IVOCLAR VIVADENT, INC.
    Date Cleared
    2016-04-12

    (105 days)

    Product Code
    EBG
    Regulation Number
    872.3770
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K150432,K102341,K132937
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    TelioCAD Multi

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    For manufacturing by a CAD/CAM System:

    • Provisional anterior and posterior crowns with a maximum wear period of up to 12 months

    • Provisional anterior and posterior bridges with up to two adjacent pontics for a maximum wear period of up to 12 months

    • Provisional inlay and onlays

    Device Description

    Telio CAD Multi are PMMA discs used for fabrication of long-term temporaries by means of CAD/CAM technology. The PMMA discs have a Long-term (12-month) wear period and durable shade stability with lifelike layered appearance. The device is available in 8 shades (BL2, A1, A2, A3, A3.5, A4, B1 and B2) and 4 thicknesses 12mm, 16mm, 20mm and 25mm. They are the standard 98.5 mm in diameter to permit use with the Wieland Select Milling equipment or other equipment which accepts 98.5 mm discs. The material exhibits high homogeneity due to industrial manufacturing process and temporaries can be easily reproduced using the CAD/CAM Technology. The device is contraindicated for use in permanent restorations and bridge designs involving more than two adjacent pontics. The device should not be used in patients with para-functional habits, ex. Bruxism or patients known to be allergic to the ingredients.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the TelioCAD Multi device, structured to answer your specific questions.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document primarily references meeting existing ISO standards rather than defining new, specific acceptance criteria with numerical targets. The "Reported Device Performance" simply states that the device "met all requirements of the standard."

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard Reference)Reported Device Performance (Met/Did Not Meet)
    ISO 10477:2004 Dentistry - Polymer based crown and bridge materials (for Surface finish, Flexural Strength, Bond strength, Water Sorption, Solubility, Shade Consistency, Color stability)Met all requirements
    ISO 20795-1:2013 Dentistry - Base Polymers - Part 1: Denture Base Polymers (for Modulus of Elasticity, Residual monomer)Met these requirements
    ISO 179-1:2010 Charpy toughnessConducted (no pass/fail stated, but implied positive for "additional insight")
    ISO 180:2000 Izod impact strengthConducted (no pass/fail stated, but implied positive for "additional insight")
    ISO 868:2003 Vickers Hardness (converted from Shore D)Conducted (no pass/fail stated, but implied positive for "additional insight")
    ISO 10993-1 BiocompatibilityNo new elements, no change in biocompatibility
    ISO 7504 BiocompatibilityNo new elements, no change in biocompatibility

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not specify the sample sizes used for the tests conducted according to the ISO standards.
    The document does not specify the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective. It is implied that the testing was conducted by the manufacturer as part of their 510(k) submission.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This type of information is not applicable to this document. The "ground truth" here is defined by objective physical and chemical measurements against established international standards for dental materials, not through expert consensus or clinical judgment on a test set.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable as the evaluation is based on objective material testing against ISO standards, not on human interpretation that would require an adjudication method.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance

    This information is not applicable. TelioCAD Multi is a dental material (PMMA discs for temporary restorations), not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive device for human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study and effect size in this context are irrelevant.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    This information is not applicable. As stated above, this device is a dental material, not an algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for this device is based on established international standards for dental materials (ISO standards 10477:2004, 20795-1:2013, 179-1:2010, 180:2000, 868:2003, 10993-1, 7504). These standards define the acceptable physical, mechanical, and biological properties for the material's intended use.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable. This device is a material, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable. As this is not an AI/ML device, there is no training set or associated ground truth establishment process in that context.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1