Search Results

The Teleport XT microcatheters are indicated for:

• supporting and facilitating the placement of guidewires in the coronary and peripheral vasculature.
• exchanging guidewires in the coronary and peripheral vasculature.
• the delivery of contrast media into the coronary, peripheral, and abdominal vasculature.

Teleport XT Microcatheter is a single lumen OTW catheter offered in one size (2.1F, distal OD) with working lengths of 90cm, 135cm or 150cm, designed for use in the coronary and peripheral vasculature. The shaft profile gradually changes from 2.8F (0.0370") to 2.1F (0.0280"). The catheter consists of five primary sections: hub, body shaft, proximal section, distal section, and a radiopaque tip. The distal most 60cm of the outer surface is coated with hydrophilic polymer to increase lubricity and the lumen of the catheter is lined with fluoropolymer to facilitate movement of the guidewire. The catheter is compatible with a standard 0.014-inch (0.36mm) guidewire.

The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA for a medical device called the "Teleport XT Microcatheter." This document does not contain information about acceptance criteria and study results for an AI/ML device. Instead, it outlines the regulatory approval process for a physical medical device.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for information regarding acceptance criteria and study details for an AI/ML device based on the provided text. The document discusses performance data for a microcatheter, which includes physical tests such as:

• Sterilization
• Shelf-Life Performance Testing
• Particulate Evaluation
• Visual Inspection
• Dimension Inspection
• Media Flow Rate
• Simulated Use
• Vacuum Leakage
• Shaft Burst Pressure
• Guidewire Compatibility
• Coating Integrity
• Flexibility and Kinking
• Corrosion Resistance
• Torque Strength
• Tensile
• Radiopacity
• Pouch Integrity
• Pouch Burst
• Seal Strength

The document states: "The Teleport XT microcatheter test results met all acceptance criteria and were similar to the predicate and reference devices." However, it does not detail what those specific acceptance criteria were or provide the reported performance values. It also does not discuss any of the AI/ML specific criteria you requested (sample sizes for test/training sets, data provenance, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone performance).

Ask a specific question about this device