Search Results

The Twin Star Compartment Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System is intended for the immediate or continuous measurement of intracompartmental pressure and for the withdrawal of fluid for subsequent analysis. The measured pressures and the withdrawn fluid serve as an aid in the diagnosis of compartment syndrome.

The Twin Star Compartment Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System Consists of two major components i.e., an Introducer and an indwelling Catheter. The Introducer consists of a plastic sheath placed over a stainless steel trocar. The Introducer provides an access to the targeted muscle compartment to facilitate the placement of the indwelling Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter. The indwelling Catheter is designed to measure intramuscular compartment pressure as well as provide a means to collect a sample interstitial fluid for laboratory analysis. The indwelling Catheter is designed for use up to 24 hours. The Twin Star Compartment Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System is designed to be used with currently marketed equipment including a vacuum pump, infusion pump, pressure transducer and monitor.

The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for the "Twin Star Compartment Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System." However, it does not include detailed acceptance criteria or a comprehensive study report with the specific information requested in your prompt. The document primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

Based on the available text, here's what can be extracted and what is missing:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document states: "Documentation has been provided which demonstrates that the Twin Star Compartment Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System is substantially equivalent to other legally marketed predicate devices such as the Stryker Intra-Compartment Pressure Monitor System: Comparison of the Twin Star Compartment Syndrome Pressure Monitoring and Fluid Collection Catheter System with the predicate system to measure intracompartment pressure in an animal model and a human clinical study."

This indicates that a comparison was made, but the specific acceptance criteria (e.g., accuracy within a certain mmHg, sensitivity, specificity, or specific performance metrics) for the Twin Star device are not explicitly stated. The document implies that the performance was comparable to the predicate device to establish substantial equivalence, but the quantitative results are not provided.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample Size (Test Set): Not specified. The document mentions "an animal model and a human clinical study" were used for comparison, but the number of animals or human subjects is not provided.
• Data Provenance: The studies included "an animal model and a human clinical study." No information on the country of origin or whether the data was retrospective or prospective is available in this text.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Number of Experts: Not specified.
• Qualifications of Experts: Not specified.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Adjudication Method: Not specified.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• MRMC Study: No, this device is a physical catheter system for measuring pressure and collecting fluid, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study related to AI assistance is not applicable.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Standalone Performance: Not applicable. This is a hardware device for direct physiological measurement, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used

• Type of Ground Truth: The document implies that the ground truth for performance comparison was obtained by measuring intracompartmental pressure using a "predicate system" (Stryker Intra-Compartment Pressure Monitor System) in both animal and human studies. This suggests the predicate device's measurements served as the reference for comparison, which is a form of comparative ground truth against an established device. For the fluid collection aspect, presumably, the ability to collect fluid for subsequent analysis was assessed.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Sample Size (Training Set): Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Ground Truth (Training Set): Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

In summary, the provided 510(k) summary focuses on establishing substantial equivalence for a physical medical device. It lacks detailed information regarding specific acceptance criteria, study sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth methodologies that would typically be found in a study report for an AI/ML or image-based diagnostic device.

Ask a specific question about this device