Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K092108
    Date Cleared
    2009-08-13

    (30 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3060
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TRUSS™ Thoracolumbar Plate System is intended for use in the treatment of thoracolumbar (T1-L5) spine instability as a result of fracture (including dislocation and subluxation), tumor, degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal stenosis, or failed previous spine surgery.

    Device Description

    The TRUSS™ Thoracolumbar Plate System consists of rigid and compression plates of various lengths that are used with variable or fixed angle bone screws. These plates attach to the anterolateral or lateral portion of the vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5). Implants are composed of titanium allov, as specified in ASTM F136. F1295 and F1472.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the TRUSS™ Thoracolumbar Plate System. It focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices through mechanical testing. The document highlights the device's indications for use and its regulatory classification.

    However, the provided text does not contain any information regarding clinical studies, acceptance criteria for device performance in a clinical context, or details about the methodological aspects requested such as sample sizes for test/training sets, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment for AI/device performance evaluation.

    The "Basis of Substantial Equivalence" section explicitly states: "Mechanical testing in accordance with the 'Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s', May 3, 2004 is presented." This indicates that the evaluation for this device was primarily based on benchtop mechanical testing to demonstrate performance similar to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study evaluating its performance against specific clinical acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format of the table and detailed points, as the input document does not contain this type of data.

    To provide the requested details, a document describing a clinical study or performance evaluation with specific acceptance criteria, test sets, expert reviews, and ground truth methodologies would be necessary.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1