Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(57 days)
The indications for use of this tibial insert are noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis or traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle, post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy, moderate valgus, varus or flexion deformities, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
This component is available in seven sizes to fit into, and articulate with, the existing Foundation Baseplates and Femoral Components. This device is used in conjunction with the Foundation® Tibial Baseplates and Femurs. This insert is intended to provide more congruency between the insert and femur than is available with the primary insert. However, it will provide similar, or slightly more, congruency than the Foundation® Posterior Stabilized Knee. Anterior/posterior stability is greater than the primary insert because of the increased height of the anterior and posterior lips. Rotational stability is similar to the primary insert.
This document, K963028, describes a medical device called a "Tibial Insert." It is a summary of safety and effectiveness information for a 510(k) submission to the FDA.
The provided text does not contain any information related to acceptance criteria or studies that prove the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of AI/ML performance evaluation.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the tables and information outlined.
The document describes a mechanical implant (a tibial insert for knee replacement surgery) and discusses its design, indications for use, and comparison to predicate devices, but it contains no data on:
- Device performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity for an AI model)
- Sample sizes for test or training sets
- Ground truth establishment
- Expert involvement or adjudication methods
- Comparative effectiveness studies with human readers
- Standalone algorithm performance
It appears the request is based on an assumption that the provided document is describing an AI/ML device, which it is not.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1