Search Results

The Network System is intended to provide electronic management of the acquisition, storage, distribution and review of Medical Images. Management activities include: Acquisition of the Network System from all medical modalities and digitized films. Storage archive is managed by a database. Distribution and wide area networks based on standard TCP protocols. Review Reading Station (MMRS), the primary diagnostic reading station. The reading station has all necessary functions to enable full Radiological interpretation Images.

The Network System is a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). The system is intended to computerize Medical Image handling in Medical institutions. The computerization of the Medical records improves the efficiency of Medical Record handling and thus has a positive effect on Medical practice. The Network System is intended to provide electronic management of the acquisition, storage, distribution and review of Medical Images.

Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for "The Network System" based on the provided text:

Important Note: The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). For such systems, the "acceptance criteria" and "device performance" are typically related to the functional capabilities of saving, retrieving, and displaying images, rather than accuracy metrics (like sensitivity/specificity) for a diagnostic AI. The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device for these functionalities. There is no mention of an AI algorithm or diagnostic performance criteria in the provided text.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Given the nature of the device (a PACS), the acceptance criteria and reported performance revolve around its ability to manage medical images.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The provided document does not mention a specific "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance or AI validation. The 510(k) submission focuses on the functional capabilities of the PACS and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. Therefore, no information regarding sample size or data provenance for a "test set" (as typically understood for AI evaluation) is available.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

This information is not applicable and not provided in the document as it pertains to a PACS system, not a diagnostic AI algorithm that requires expert-established ground truth for a test set.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This information is not applicable and not provided, as there is no diagnostic "test set" requiring adjudication mentioned in the document.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

An MRMC study is not mentioned in the document. The device is a PACS for image management, not an AI intended to assist human readers diagnostically. Therefore, there is no information about human reader improvement with or without AI assistance.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

A standalone study for an AI algorithm is not mentioned in the document. The device is a PACS system, and its performance is described in terms of its ability to acquire, store, distribute, and display images, not evaluate them diagnostically as a standalone algorithm.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The concept of "ground truth" (e.g., pathology, outcomes data) is not applicable and not mentioned in the context of this PACS device. The ground truth for this type of system would be its functional correctness (e.g., did the image save correctly, can it be retrieved, is it displayed properly).

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

The document does not mention a "training set" as it is describing a PACS system, not an AI algorithm that requires training data.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

This information is not applicable and not provided, as there is no "training set" or AI algorithm mentioned that would require ground truth establishment.

Ask a specific question about this device