Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K080234
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2008-02-14

    (15 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    TERASON ECHO T/3000 ULTRASOUND SYSTEM WITH STRESS ECHO

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TERASON™ ECHO/t3000 Ultrasound System with Stress Echo is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body; specific indications for use a tabulated in Section 4.3 of this submission.

    Device Description

    The TERASON™ ECHO/t3000 Ultrasound System with Stress Echo comprises two versions of the TERATECH Model 2000 Imaging System introduced under K051334.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the TERASON™ Ultrasound System with Continuous Wave (CW) Doppler. It describes the device, its intended use, and the basis for substantial equivalence to predicate devices, but does not contain information about specific performance acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria.

    Instead, the document primarily focuses on:

    • Device Description: Comparing the TERASON™ Echo/t3000 to the TERATECH 2000, highlighting features like CW Doppler, ECG Trigger, Tissue Doppler, LV Dyssynchrony Assessment, and Stress Echo.
    • Intended Use: A detailed table outlining clinical applications and modes of operation for various transducers (AcuNav 8F & 10F, 4V2, UST-534, V5Ms).
    • Substantial Equivalence: Stating that the Stress Echo function is substantially equivalent to the Acuson Cypress Ultrasound, and that the device will be marketed with previously cleared transducers from Acuson and Aloka.
    • FDA Clearance Letter: Confirming the FDA's review and determination of substantial equivalence.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving their fulfillment as it is not present in the provided text. The document is an FDA 510(k) summary, which typically focuses on demonstrating equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices rather than detailing independent performance studies against specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1