Search Results

This device is intended to acquire and condition the ECG signal from a patient so that it can be transmitted via radio frequency to a workstation in a hospital or clinical setting where the ECG is displayed and analyzed. This device is for use with ambulatory adult patients, which need monitoring while undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation, or other monitoring. The data output from the telemetry remains of the patients' progress through rehabilitation or other monitoring. Patients demographies, exercise protocor hire wireless input devices or automatically a variety of connifereially available weeks. A database can be created for use with an Outcomes program.

ScottCare TeleKellaborm 2004 Cardiopannonial (outpatient) environment). It is used device intended for non-diagnostic use in a remote or in-hospital (outpation) of coursely t device intended for non-thaghosic use in a remote transmitted via radio frequency to a to acquire and condition the ECG signal so that it can be seriest, of the heat, of workstation. The telemetry capable system measures the electrical activity of the heart of workstation. The telement capable system inteasedial or pumonary rehabilitation, or other ambulatory adults undergoning presentous monitoring such as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) patients.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text for the ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System:

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device seeking substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not a study report detailing performance against specific acceptance criteria for a novel algorithm or AI. As such, the information you've requested regarding AI improvement, standalone algorithm performance, and training/test set specifics for AI will not be present. The focus of this document is demonstrating the device's adherence to general safety and performance standards for a medical device, and its similarity to existing, legally marketed devices.

However, I can extract the information that is available:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Note: The "acceptance criteria" in this context refer to compliance with recognized medical device standards rather than specific statistical performance metrics against a defined ground truth for a diagnostic task. The "reported device performance" indicates that the device meets these standards.

Study Details

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

   • The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance involving patient data and ground truth. The testing performed was for compliance with electrical and safety standards.
   • There is no mention of patient data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for performance evaluation.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

   • Not applicable as no diagnostic "test set" requiring expert ground truth was described in this document.

3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

   • Not applicable as no diagnostic "test set" was described.

4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

   • No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was mentioned.
   • This device is a hardware system for acquiring and displaying ECG signals, not an AI diagnostic algorithm. Therefore, there is no discussion of human reader improvement with or without AI assistance.

5. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

   • Not applicable. This is a hardware system, not a standalone algorithm.

6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

   • Not applicable. The "ground truth" for the tests performed was defined by the parameters and requirements of the cited industry standards (e.g., voltage limits, emission levels).

7. The sample size for the training set:

   • Not applicable. This document describes a medical device, not a machine learning model that would have a "training set."

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

   • Not applicable. As above, no training set for a machine learning model is involved.

Summary of Device and its Evaluation:

The ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 is a Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System intended to acquire and condition ECG signals from patients for display and analysis in a hospital or clinical setting. It is designed for non-diagnostic use with ambulatory adult patients undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation.

The "study" described in the 510(k) summary is primarily focused on demonstrating the device's compliance with established safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) standards (e.g., IEC 60601-1, various EN/IEC 61000 series standards). The document asserts that the device meets the requirements of these standards. The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to show substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices, specifically "ScottCare TeleRehab™ System of Cardiac Rehabilitation" and the "Quinton Q-Tel RMS release." The argument for equivalence is based on similar intended use, technological characteristics, operational principles, performance characteristics, and environment of use, along with compliance to shared safety and performance standards. No advanced diagnostic algorithms or AI-driven performance metrics are discussed.

Ask a specific question about this device