Search Results

The Medic4All Telemedicine System Model VMS-01 is intended to collect and transmit physiological information, such as weight, via standard telephone lines or the internet to local or remote computer systems for use by the patient or a healthcare professional.

Medic4All's VMS-01 telemedicine system (VMS-01) is a wireless telephonic/internet-based physiologic monitoring system, designed for care of patients requiring periodic monitoring. It is designed for interactive, remote, physiological data measurement, transmission, processing, storage and display of data. Additionally, the system allows optional verbal and video conferencing between a care giver and a patient through common telephone lines or the internet and optional hardware.

The Medic4All Telemedicine System VMS-01 is a device intended to collect and transmit physiological information, such as weight, via standard telephone lines or the Internet to local or remote computer systems for use by the patient or a healthcare professional.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

The provided 510(k) summary does not specify the sample size used for the test set or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective) for any of the performance tests. The document broadly states "Verification and validation testing activities were conducted."

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

This information is not provided in the 510(k) summary. The device's primary function is data collection and transmission, not diagnostic interpretation that would typically require expert ground truth.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

This information is not provided in the 510(k) summary. Given the nature of the device (data collection and transmission), adjudication methods typically associated with diagnostic image or signal interpretation are unlikely to be relevant.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improved with AI vs without AI assistance:

A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not applicable and not done. This device is a telemedicine system for data transmission and does not involve AI for interpretation by human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

A standalone performance evaluation of the "algorithm" (the system's functionality) was conducted. The document states "In all instances, the VMS-01 functioned as intended" for various tests including unit testing, integration testing, data integrity testing, and performance testing. This suggests the system itself was evaluated for its ability to perform its stated functions independent of a human interpreting its output for diagnostic purposes.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

The "ground truth" for this device would be its ability to accurately collect and transmit physiological information. For instance, for "data integrity testing," the ground truth would be that the transmitted data matches the collected data without alteration or loss. For "performance testing," it would be that the system operates within expected parameters (e.g., speed, reliability). The document does not specify the exact methods for establishing this ground truth for each test category, but it implies direct verification of the system's operational correctness.

8. The sample size for the training set:

This information is not provided. The VMS-01 is described as a "wireless telephonic/internet-based physiologic monitoring system" and its design focuses on data measurement, transmission, processing, storage, and display. There is no indication of machine learning or AI components that would typically require a training set in the context of diagnostic interpretation.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

This information is not provided and is likely not relevant, as there is no mention of a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI for diagnostic purposes for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Medic4All Telemedicine System Model VMS-01 is intended to collect and transmit physiological information, such as non-invasive blood pressure, via standard telephone lines or the internet to local or remote computer systems for use by the patient or a healthcare professional.

Medic4All's VMS-01 telemedicine system (VMS-01) is a wireless telephonic/internet-based physiologic monitoring system, designed for care of patients requiring periodic monitoring. It is designed for interactive, remote, physiological data measurement, transmission, processing, storage and display of data. Additionally, the system allows optional verbal and video conferencing between a care giver and a patient through common telephone lines or the internet and optional hardware.

The provided text describes the "Medic4All Telemedicine System VMS-01" in the context of a 510(k) submission to the FDA. However, it does not include detailed acceptance criteria or a specific study proving the device meets quantitative performance metrics.

Instead, the document focuses on:

• Substantial Equivalence: Comparing the VMS-01 to predicate devices (Philips Medical Systems M3810A TeleMonitoring System and BL-Healthcare, Inc. Remote Care Management System) for intended use, indications, technological characteristics, and principles of operation.
• Performance Data (General): A general statement that "Verification and validation testing activities were conducted to establish the performance and reliability characteristics of the telemedicine system. Testing involved EMC/Electrical safety; unit testing; integration testing; data integrity testing; usability testing; environmental testing; compatibility testing; performance testing, system testing, and load/performance testing for the whole telemedicine system. In all instances, the VMS-01 functioned as intended."

Therefore, many of the requested details about specific acceptance criteria, study methodologies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement are not available in the provided text.

Here's a breakdown of what can and cannot be answered based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Explanation: The document states that performance testing was conducted and the device "functioned as intended," but it does not specify what those "intentions" or quantitative criteria were (e.g., specific accuracy levels for blood pressure measurements, data transmission reliability percentages, etc.).

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample size for test set: Not specified.
• Data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not specified.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Number of experts: Not specified.
• Qualifications of experts: Not specified.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Adjudication method: Not specified.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done

• MRMC study done: No. The device is a telemedicine system for collecting and transmitting physiological information, not an imaging device typically subject to MRMC studies.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Standalone study done: The performance testing mentioned ("unit testing; integration testing; data integrity testing; usability testing; environmental testing; compatibility testing; performance testing, system testing, and load/performance testing") would likely encompass standalone performance aspects. However, a dedicated "standalone performance" study in the context of an AI algorithm is not explicitly detailed, nor is there mention of a specific algorithm (beyond a general "telemedicine system"). The device's primary function is data collection and transmission.

7. The type of ground truth used

• Type of ground truth: Not specified. For a system that collects physiological information like non-invasive blood pressure, the "ground truth" would typically refer to the accuracy of the measurements compared to a reference standard, or the reliability of data transmission. The document only generally mentions "data integrity testing" and "performance testing."

8. The sample size for the training set

• Sample size for training set: Not applicable based on the information provided. The VMS-01 is described as a telemedicine system for data collection and transmission, not an AI/machine learning algorithm that requires a "training set."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• How ground truth for training set was established: Not applicable, as there's no mention of a training set for an AI/ML algorithm.

Ask a specific question about this device