Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(184 days)
Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3), Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3)
The Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) and Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) are sterile and non-sterile, single use surgical apparel intended to be worn by healthcare professionals to help protect both the patient and the healthcare worker from the transfer of microorganisms, body fluids, and particulate matter.
The Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) and Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) meets the level 3 requirements of ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in healthcare facilities.
The Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) and Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) have been validated using an ethylene oxide sterilization process. The Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) and Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) are also sold as bulk single-use, non-sterile, to repackager/relabeler establishments for further packaging and sterilization using the validated EtO sterilization method according to ISO 11135-1 prior to being provided to the end user.
Not Found
The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a surgical gown and does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study related to a medical device's performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or other typical performance metrics for diagnostic or AI-powered devices.
The document states that the "Standard Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) and Reinforced Surgical Gown (AAMI Level 3) meets the level 3 requirements of ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance and classification of protective apparel and drapes intended for use in healthcare facilities." This indicates that the acceptance criteria for the gown's barrier performance are the Level 3 requirements of ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012. However, the document does not provide the specific reported performance values or details of the study that proves the device meets these criteria. It only asserts that it "meets" them.
Therefore, I cannot fill in the requested table or answer most of the questions as the necessary information is not present in the provided text.
Here's a breakdown of what cannot be extracted from the text:
- 1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: The acceptance criterion mentioned is "Level 3 requirements of ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid barrier performance." However, the reported device performance against this standard (e.g., specific test results, values for hydrostatic pressure, impact penetration, etc.) is not detailed in the document.
- 2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable as specific performance testing details are not provided.
- 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable.
- 4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
- 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This document is about surgical gowns, not an AI-powered diagnostic device or an AI assistance system.
- 6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
- 7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable. The "ground truth" for a surgical gown would be its physical barrier properties as measured by standardized tests.
- 8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
The document focuses on the regulatory clearance process for a medical device (surgical gowns) based on its compliance with established industry standards for barrier performance (ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Level 3) and sterilization validation (ethylene oxide process according to ISO 11135-1). It does not delve into the detailed results of the tests performed to demonstrate this compliance.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1