Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(127 days)
The Single-Use Latex Sterile Surgical Gloves are device made of natural rubber intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect a surgical wound from contamination.
The proposed device, Single-Use Latex Sterile Surgical Gloves is a sterilized and disposable medical glove intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect a surgical wound from contamination. The proposed device is made of natural rubber latex, per standard ASTM D3577- 09(15), the rubber surgical gloves classification is: Type 1-qloves compounded primarily from nature rubber latex." The qloves are powderfree and available in white in sizes 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5 and 9. The proposed device is provided Radiation sterilized to achieve the sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6. The latex surgical glove shelf life is 3 years.
This document is a 510(k) Pre-market Notification for a medical device, specifically Single-Use Latex Sterile Surgical Gloves (SG100). It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not necessarily a comprehensive study proving novel effectiveness.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document presents two tables relevant to acceptance criteria and device performance:
Table 1: Comparison of Technological Characteristics (Proposed vs. Predicate) - This table indirectly shows performance against standards and similarities with the predicate.
| Characteristic | Acceptance criteria of the standard (Implied or Explicit) | Proposed device K231446 | Predicate device K212848 | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product name | N/A (Comparison, not an acceptance criterion) | Single-Use Latex Sterile Surgical Gloves | Sterile Latex Surgical Gloves Powder Free | Similar |
| Indications For Use | N/A (Comparison, not an acceptance criterion) | To protect surgical wound from contamination | To protect surgical wound from contamination | Similar |
| Product Code | KGO | KGO | KGO | Same |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR 878.4460 | 21 CFR 878.4460 | 21 CFR 878.4460 | Same |
| Powdered or Powder free | Powdered free | Powdered free | Powdered free | Same |
| Classification as per ASTM D3577-2019 | Type I - gloves compounded primarily from natural rubber latex | Type I - gloves compounded primarily from natural rubber latex | Type I - gloves compounded primarily from natural rubber latex | Same |
| Type of use | Over the counter use | Over the counter use | Over the counter use | Same |
| Shelf Life | 3 Years | 3 Years | 3 Years | Same |
| Sterilization | Radiation, SAL- 10-6 | Radiation, SAL- 10-6 | Radiation, SAL- 10-6 | Same |
| Single use | Yes | Yes | Yes | Same |
| Label and Labeling | Meet FDA's Requirement | Meet FDA's Requirement | Meet FDA's Requirement | Same |
| Protein Content | N/A (Comparison, predicate has a lower value, but both meet <200µg/dm²) | 141µg/dm² | 50µg/dm² | Similar (Both likely meet the <200µg/dm² requirement though predicate is lower) |
Table 2: Characteristics Comparison including Acceptance Criteria and Performance (This table on pages 6-8 directly addresses performance against standards)
| Characteristics | Acceptance criteria of the standard | Subject device K231446 data (Reported Performance) | Predicate device K212848 data (Reported Performance) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||||
| Length: Min 265 mm | Min 265 mm | 281 mm | 380 mm | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Size (e.g., 6.0, 6.5, etc., ±6mm tolerance) | Specified diameters with ±6mm tolerance (e.g., 6.0: 76+/-6mm) | Meets specified diameters (e.g., 6.0: 76mm, 6.5: 84mm, 7.0: 90mm, 7.5: 96mm, 8.0: 102mm, 8.5: 109mm, 9.0: 115mm) | Meets specified diameters (e.g., 6.0: 74mm, 6.5: 86mm, 7.0: 92mm, 7.5: 98mm, 8.0: 105mm, 8.5: 110mm, 9.0: 116mm) | Meets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Cuff, Palm, Finger Tip Thickness: Min 0.10 mm | Min 0.10 mm | Cuff- 0.16mmPalm-0.18mmFinger Tip-0.22mm | Cuff- 0.12mmPalm-0.16mmFinger Tip-0.21mm | |
| Physical Properties | ||||
| Tensile Strength Before Aging | 24 Mpa minimum | 37 Mpa | 28.55 Mpa | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Ultimate Elongation Before Aging | 750% minimum | 814% | 870% | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Stress at 500% Before Aging | 5.5 MPa Max | 3.5 Mpa | 5.1 Mpa | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Tensile Strength After Aging | 18 Mpa minimum | 32.49 Mpa | 23.48 Mpa | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Ultimate Elongation After Aging | 560% minimum | 760% | 731% | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019, Standard Specification for Rubber Surgical Gloves |
| Integrity | ||||
| Freedom from Holes | AQL 1.5 | AQL 1.5 | AQL 1.0 | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019 and ASTM D5151-2019, Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves |
| Powder residue for powder-free glove | Powder content < 2 mg/Glove | 0.21 mg/Glove | 0.40 mg/Glove | SimilarMeets ASTM D3577-2019 and ASTM D6124-06 (Reapproved 2017), Standard Test Method for Residual Powder on Medical Gloves |
| Biocompatibility | ||||
| Skin Irritation & Skin Sensitization (ISO 10993-10) | Non-irritant and Non-Sensitizer | Non- irritant and Non-Sensitizer | Non- irritant and Non-Sensitizer | Same |
| In vitro cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) | (Implied non-cytotoxic, but reported as "Cytotoxic". This is a discrepancy or a nuance in reporting as per usual biocompatibility pass/fail criteria) | Cytotoxic | Cytotoxic | Same (This usually means it fails, which is unusual for a cleared device. Needs clarification in a deeper dive) |
| Material Mediated pyrogenicity (ISO 10993-11 & USP 41) | Non pyrogenic | Non pyrogenic | No data available | --- (Subject device met; predicate data not available) |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity (ISO 10993-11) | Device extracts do not pose an acute systemic toxicity concern | Under the conditions of study the device extracts do not pose an acute systemic toxicity concern | Under the conditions of study the device extracts do not pose an acute systemic toxicity concern | Same |
| Bacterial Endotoxin (USP 42 <85>) | <20EU/pair of gloves | <20EU/pair of gloves | <20EU/pair of gloves | Same |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document specifies non-clinical tests were conducted according to various ASTM and ISO standards (pages 9-10). These standards define sample sizes for specific tests (e.g., AQL for holes, specific number of samples for physical properties, etc.). However, the exact sample sizes used for each test are not explicitly stated in this document, only that the tests "Meets the requirement" of the standards.
The data provenance is from non-clinical testing performed on the "Subject device K231446", which is a prospective test for this submission. The country of origin of the data is not explicitly stated, but the manufacturer is Fitone Latex Products Co., Ltd. Guangdong, China.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This device is a physical product (surgical gloves) and the performance criteria are based on objective measurements defined by international standards (ASTM, ISO, USP). Therefore, no human "experts" are used to establish ground truth in the way one would for diagnostic imaging or clinical assessment. The "ground truth" is the established technical specification in the referenced standards.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is for objective physical/chemical testing per standards, not for subjective assessments requiring adjudication.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a surgical glove, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a physical product, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The ground truth for the performance of the surgical gloves is based on international consensus standards and specifications (ASTM D3577-19 for physical properties, ASTM D5151-19 for holes, ASTM D6124-06 for residual powder, ASTM D5712-15 for protein content, ISO 10993 series for biocompatibility, ISO 11137 series for sterilization, and USP standards for bacterial endotoxin and pyrogenicity). These standards define the acceptable range or threshold for each characteristic.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical product, not an AI model requiring a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1