Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K232495
    Date Cleared
    2024-05-16

    (273 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2700
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Sempulse Halo Vital Signs Monitor

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Halo vital signs monitor is a prescription device intended to be used as an adult patient monitor. It is indicated as a single- or multi-parameter vital signs monitor for SpO2 - pulse oximetry, pulse rate, respiratory rate, core body temperature, and skin temperature for spot-check measurements and continuous monitoring from the back of the cavum concha and the neck.

    The Halo monitor may be used in hospitals, healthcare facilities, emergency medical transport, home healthcare settings, and other healthcare applications to include medical military settings in the field. The monitor is intended to be used in trauma scenarios, triage, motion, low perfusion, general monitoring, and telemedicine settings. It is reusable, transportable, and for use in all types of ambulances.

    The Halo monitor uses wired or wireless communications to transmit vital signs data to a handheld or personal computer. The monitor is intended to be used by trained healthcare providers who are trained to interpret the vital signs readings and make appropriate medical interventions or patients who are und guidance of a medical professional or doctor. Alarms can be set with user-defined thresholds.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the "Sempulse Halo Vital Signs Monitor." This document focuses on the regulatory clearance process and does not contain the detailed technical study information (acceptance criteria, test set, ground truth, training set, etc.) that would prove the device meets specific performance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given text.

    The typical content of a 510(k) summary (which is a separate document often submitted for public review after clearance) or a detailed performance validation study would include such information. This letter simply confirms that the device has been found "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1