Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(89 days)
Synthetic Vinyl Examination Glove, Powder Free is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Synthetic Vinyl Examination Gloves, Powder-Free
This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Synthetic Vinyl Examination Gloves, Powder-Free". It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets such criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.
The document is a regulatory approval for a medical device (gloves) based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on performance studies against specific acceptance criteria like those used for AI/ML algorithms.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. This document does not describe:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample sizes for test or training sets, nor data provenance.
- Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth establishment.
- Adjudication methods.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness studies.
- Standalone algorithm performance studies.
- Type of ground truth used.
- Ground truth establishment for a training set.
Ask a specific question about this device
(38 days)
Synthetic Vinyl Examination Glove, Powder Free is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Synthetic Vinyl Examination Gloves, Powder-Free
I am sorry, but the provided text is a letter from the FDA regarding the 510(k) premarket notification for "Synthetic Vinyl Examination Gloves, Powder-Free." It primarily discusses the regulatory classification of the device and general compliance requirements.
This document does not contain any information about:
- Acceptance criteria for device performance
- A study proving the device meets acceptance criteria
- Sample sizes for test or training sets
- Data provenance
- Ground truth establishment or type
- Number or qualifications of experts
- Adjudication methods
- Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies
- Standalone algorithm performance studies
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them based on the provided text.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1