Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K040765
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-04-12

    (18 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES 5.0/7.3 MM CANNULATED LOCKING SCREWS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Synthes 5.0/7.3 mm Cannulated Locking screws are intended to be used with existing Synthes LCP® plating systems for the fixation of various long bones, such as the femur.

    Device Description

    The Synthes 5.0/7.3 mm Cannulated Locking Screws feature self-drilling and self-tapping tips, have a flat head profile with rounded edges with a hex drive recess. They are available in additional lengths ranging from 100 - 145mm. The threads below the head of each locking screw are designed to engage with the threaded holes of currently marketed Synthes LCP® plating systems.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that the device meets such criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for the Synthes 5.0/7.3 mm Cannulated Locking Screws, which primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

    The content includes:

    • Device Description: Synthes 5.0/7.3 mm Cannulated Locking Screws are self-drilling, self-tapping, have a flat head with rounded edges and a hex drive recessive, and are available in various lengths.
    • Intended Use: For use with existing Synthes LCP® plating systems for the fixation of various long bones, such as the femur.
    • Material: Stainless Steel.
    • Classification: Class II, 21 CFR 888.3040: Smooth or Threaded Metallic Bone Fixation Fastener.
    • Predicate Device: Synthes 5.0/7.3 mm Cannulated Locking Screws (the document states the predicate is the same as the new device, which is unusual for a typical 510(k) summary, often implying a modification or re-submission for the same device type).
    • Substantial Equivalence: Stated as supported by comparative information.

    It explicitly lacks details regarding:

    • Specific acceptance criteria (e.g., performance thresholds for strength, fatigue, biocompatibility, etc.).
    • Any study design, methodology, results, or data pertaining to the device's performance against such criteria.
    • The elements related to AI/algorithm performance (test set, ground truth, experts, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set) are entirely irrelevant as this is a physical medical device, not an AI or software-based diagnostic tool.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1