Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K022162
    Date Cleared
    2002-08-01

    (29 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Stryker T4 Urethane Hood, Zippered Toga, and Pullover Toga are components of a personal protection system that is intended to provide a barrier between the operating environment and the members of the surgical team in order to help protect against contamination and/or exposure of infectious body fluids and harmful microorganisms.

    Device Description

    The Stryker Personal Protection Systems include a self-contained ventilation helmet, a hood, a toga, rechargeable battery, and accessories.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary and FDA clearance letter for a medical device. It describes the device and its intended use, but does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets those criteria, nor does it mention any AI or algorithm performance.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific information you listed (acceptance criteria table, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details) because that information is not present in the provided document.

    The document states:

    • Technological Comparison: "Technological characteristics are the same as previously cleared for the Stryker Steri-sheild Personal Protection System (K944393, K993148, K011755)."

    This indicates that the device was cleared based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, meaning it is considered to perform similarly and have similar safety and efficacy profiles as devices already legally marketed. It suggests that specific new performance studies for this iteration of the device were likely not necessary for 510(k) clearance, as its characteristics were deemed identical to previously cleared devices.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1