Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K093615
    Date Cleared
    2010-03-04

    (101 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SPI DENTAL IMPLANT, ELEMENT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    SPI® Dental Implant, ELEMENT is for one-stage or two-stage surgical procedures. SPI Dental Implant, ELEMENT is intended for immediate placement and function on single-tooth and/or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, to restore chewing function. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted. In the case of edentulous patients, four or more implants must be used in immediately loaded cases.

    Contraindications for the use of SPI ELEMENT implant Ø 3.5 mm: These implants are not suitable for applications in areas where pronounced rotation and translation movements occur, causing the implant to be subjected to large bending movements.

    • Restoration of posterior teeth in the upper and lower jaw .
    • Single-tooth restoration of canines and central incisors in the upper jaw .
    • Any application involving retentive anchors .
    Device Description

    The design of the Thommen Medical AG SPI® Dental Implant System implants has been modified to include new sizes and corresponding abutments that will be marketed as the SPI® Dental Implant, ELEMENT. All features other than these implant sizes remain the same as the currently marketed SP1® ELEMENT implants. Other components of the SP10 Dental Implant System have not been modified, are suitable for use with the modified implants, and will be sold under the SPI Dental Implant System name.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text describes a 510(k) summary for a dental implant device (SPI® Dental Implant, ELEMENT) and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria. The document is primarily focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices for regulatory approval, rather than detailing performance studies with specific statistical metrics.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for a test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study details.
    6. Standalone performance study details.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1