Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K081676
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2008-07-02

    (15 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1550
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SONOACE X6 DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The SONOACE X6 system and transducers are intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid analysis of the human body. The clinical applications include: General, Gynecology, Abdomen, OB, Renal, Urology, Vascular, Small Part, Fetal Heart, Breast, Musculoskeletal, Pediatric, Cardiac, TCD, Neonatal applications.

    Device Description

    The SONOACE X6 is a general purpose, mobile, software controlled, diagnostic ultrasound system. Its function is to acquire ultrasound data and to display the data as B mode, M mode, color Doppler imaging, power Doppler imaging, PW/CW spectral Doppler mode, Harmonic imaging, Freehand 3D imaging mode or as a combination of these modes on the LCD display. The SONOACE X6 has real time acoustic output display with two basic indices, a mechanical index and a thermal index, which are both automatically displayed. The system also provides for the measurement of anatomical structures and for analysis packages that provide information used for clinical diagnostic purposes by competent health care professionals.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for the SONOACE X6 Diagnostic Ultrasound System. This type of regulatory submission establishes substantial equivalence to a predicate device and does not typically include detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth establishment, or comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC or standalone AI performance).

    The document focuses on:

    • Substantial Equivalence: Comparing the SONOACE X6 to previously cleared ultrasound systems (SA8000 SE, K043455, and SONOACE X8, K063580) based on technological characteristics and intended uses.
    • Compliance with Standards: Listing various safety, EMC, and acoustic output standards for medical equipment that the device has been designed to meet.
    • Intended Uses: Defining the clinical applications for the system and its associated transducers.

    Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria, specifically concerning performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or human reader improvement with AI, is not present in this document. Such information is generally found in more detailed clinical or performance studies for novel devices or specific algorithm clearances, not in a 510(k) for a diagnostic ultrasound system establishing substantial equivalence to existing technology.

    However, I can extract the safety and technical standards that serve as performance criteria for the device's design.


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on designed compliance with standards):

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard Compliance)Reported Device Performance (Designed to Meet)
    Safety Requirements for Medical Equipment:
    UL 60601-1Met
    CSA C22.2 No. 601.1Met
    IEC60601-2-37 (Diagnostic Ultrasound Safety Standards)Met
    EN/IEC60601-1Met
    EMC Requirements for Medical Equipment:
    EN/IEC60601-1-2Met
    Acoustic Output Standards:
    NEMA UD 2-2004 (Acoustic Output Measurement Standard for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment)Met
    NEMA UD 3-2004 (Standard for Real Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment)Met
    IEC 61157 (Declaration of the acoustic output)Met
    Biocompatibility:
    ISO10993Met

    Since this is a 510(k) submission for a diagnostic ultrasound system based on substantial equivalence, the document does not contain the following information:

    1. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance: No specific clinical test set for performance evaluation is described.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications: No such experts or ground truth establishment process is mentioned.
    3. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable as no specific test set performance study is detailed.
    4. Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable. This type of study typically assesses AI impact on human readers, which is beyond the scope of this type of traditional ultrasound 510(k). The document only establishes substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not AI-enhanced performance.
    5. Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) study: Not applicable. The device is a diagnostic ultrasound system, not an AI algorithm.
    6. Type of ground truth used: Not applicable. Performance validation against clinical ground truth (pathology, outcomes) is not detailed in this document.
    7. Sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is not an AI/algorithm submission requiring a training set.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1