Search Results

Simulix Evolution is a radiation therapy simulation system is intended to prepare patients for radiation therapy. The Simulator emulates the geometrical positions of radiation therapy treatment machines. Using conventional radiographic and fluorographic system, patients are positioned, filmed and marked to prepare them for treatment. The Ocentra Cone Beam CT option for the Simulis Evolution Radiotion Therapy Simulator is intended to assist the Radiation Oncologist in acquiring 3D "multi slice" planning data in patient set-ups for the purpose of radiation therapy treatment planning and patient positioning

Oncentra ConeBeam is an extension to the Nucletron Simulix Evolution system. The Simulix Evolution is a Radiation Therapy Simulation System which is to be used in radiation therapy simulation, using a fluoroscopic and/or radiographic x-ray system for visualizing the volume to be exposed during radiation therapy and confirming the position and size of the therapeutic irradiation field to be applied. The Simulix Evolution is previously cleared under 510(k) #K033470. The Oncentra ConeBeam extension will give the Simulix Evolution system the capability to acquire Computer Tomography (CT) images. This is done by means of scanning the patient with a cone shaped X-ray beam. The cone shaped beam gives the possibility to acquire CT image information of a volume instead of CT image information of a single slice as with conventional fan beam CT. The images acquired with Oncentra ConeBeam will be used for the purpose of radiation therapy planning and to check the positioning of the patient.

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study that proves a device meets those criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for the Nucletron Simulix-Evolution with Oncentra™ ConeBeam, which describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, but it does not include details on acceptance criteria or performance studies.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to provide the following information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
4. Adjudication method for the test set
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and its effect size
6. If a standalone performance (algorithm only) study was done
7. The type of ground truth used
8. The sample size for the training set
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Ask a specific question about this device