Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K963542
    Date Cleared
    1996-09-27

    (23 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1665
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The safety and effectiveness of Sigma Diagnostics Electrolyte Reference Reagent, Procedure Number E3891, are demonstrated by its substantial equivalency to Beckman Electrolyte Reference Reagent Kit, Part No. 443315. Both electrolyte reference reagents are used to measure sodium, chloride, potassium, and carbon dioxide concentrations in serum or plasma, sodium, potassium, and chloride concentrations in urine, and chloride concentrations in CSF on the SYNCHRON CX®3 System, and the reaction principles for both reagents are identical.

    Device Description

    The Sigma Diagnostics methods use ion selective electrodes for determining sodium, potassium, and chloride and rate of pH change for determining carbon dioxide on the SYNCHRON CX®3 System.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the performance of the Sigma Diagnostics Electrolyte Reference Reagent (Procedure Number E3891) in comparison to the Beckman Electrolyte Reference Reagent Kit (Part No. 443315) on the SYNCHRON CX®3 System. The study aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

    Here's an analysis based on your requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" as defined thresholds for correlation coefficients or regression equations. Instead, it presents the achieved performance metrics as evidence of substantial equivalence to the predicate device. The implied acceptance is that the correlation and regression fall within an acceptable range for a substantially equivalent device. Similarly, for precision, the stated %CVs are the achieved performance, implying these are considered acceptable.

    Metric (Analyte, Sample Type)Reported Sigma Diagnostics PerformanceImplied Acceptance Criteria (relative to predicate)
    Correlation Coefficient
    Sodium (Serum)0.963High correlation (implied >~0.95 given the values)
    Potassium (Serum)0.999High correlation
    Chloride (Serum)0.973High correlation
    Total CO2 (Serum)0.992High correlation
    Sodium (Urine)0.997High correlation
    Potassium (Urine)0.998High correlation
    Chloride (Urine)0.997High correlation
    Chloride (CSF)0.891High correlation (lower but still presented as acceptable)
    Regression Equation (y = Sigma, x = Beckman)
    Sodium (Serum)y = 0.90x + 13.48Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0 (indicating good agreement)
    Potassium (Serum)y = 0.98x + 0.08Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Chloride (Serum)y = 0.91x + 10.52Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Total CO2 (Serum)y = 0.95x + 1.54Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Sodium (Urine)y = 0.95x - 0.10Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Potassium (Urine)y = 0.97x + 0.49Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Chloride (Urine)y = 0.97x + 2.06Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Chloride (CSF)y = 0.98x + 4.00Slope close to 1, intercept close to 0
    Precision (%CV)
    Sodium (Serum)
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1