LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K960092
    Device Name
    SERAQUEST TOXOPLASMA IGG
    Manufacturer
    QUEST INTL., INC.
    Date Cleared
    1996-06-17

    (158 days)

    Product Code
    LGD
    Regulation Number
    866.3780
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Microbiology
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    For the detection of human IgG antibodies to toxoplasma virus in human serum by enzyme immunoasay, to aid in the serological assessment of single samples and the diagnosis of primary infection in paired sera through the detection of Seroconversion of Toxoplasma specific IgG antibody. These reagents have not received FDA clearance for use in testing blood or plasma donors.

    Device Description

    he SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG test is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which is performed in microwells, at room temperature, in three thirty-minute incubations. It has been developed to detect IgG antibodies which are directed against Toxoplasma gondii in human serum.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document does not explicitly state pre-defined acceptance criteria for sensitivity, specificity, or overall agreement. Instead, it reports the observed performance of the SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG test relative to the predicate device.

    Performance MetricAcceptance Criteria (Not explicitly stated, assumed to be >90% based on typical IVD performance requirements for substantial equivalence)Reported Device Performance (SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG vs. INCSTAR Toxoplasma IgG Clin-ELISA™)
    Relative Sensitivity(Assumed > 90%)98.8 % to 100 % (95 % C.I.)
    Relative Specificity(Assumed > 90%)93.6 % to 100 % (95 % C.I.)
    Overall Agreement(Assumed > 90%)95.5 % to 100 % (95 % C.I.)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: 143 sera
    • Data Provenance: The samples were from "normal blood donors." The country of origin is not specified, but the applicant (Quest International, Inc.) is based in the US (North Miami, FL). The study appears to be retrospective as it uses pre-existing "sera from normal blood donors."

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    This information is not applicable to this type of study. The ground truth for the SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG test was established by comparing its results to a predicate device (INCSTAR Toxoplasma IgG Clin-ELISA™ kit), not through expert consensus or independent clinical assessment. The predicate device itself serves as the "ground truth proxy" in this context.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable. Since the comparison is against another diagnostic kit, there is no human "adjudication" in the sense of multiple experts independently evaluating cases. The results from the two devices are directly compared.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size

    No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This study compares the performance of one diagnostic device (SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG) to a predicate device (INCSTAR Toxoplasma IgG Clin-ELISA™) in a standalone manner, not involving an assessment of human reader improvement with or without AI assistance.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    Yes, a standalone performance study was done. The study evaluates the SeraQuest™ Toxoplasma IgG device itself against a predicate device, without involving human interpretation of the SeraQuest™ results. The output of the SeraQuest™ device (positive, negative, equivocal) is directly compared to the predicate device's output.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for this study was the results obtained from the predicate device, the INCSTAR Toxoplasma IgG Clin-ELISA™ kit. This is a form of comparative truth, where one established diagnostic method is used as the reference standard to evaluate a new method.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not specify the sample size for any training set. This is typical for a 510(k) summary for an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) kit that is not an AI/ML device. The "development" of such a kit usually involves analytical studies and in-house validation, but a defined "training set" in the machine learning sense is not applicable or detailed here. This is a traditional immunoassay, not an AI model.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable as there is no mention of a "training set" in the context of an AI/ML model. For this type of traditional diagnostic kit, the "ground truth" for its development would involve internal validation using characterized samples (e.g., confirmed positive and negative clinical samples, reference materials). However, the document does not detail this.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1