Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(107 days)
SCARF THREAD-HEAD (TM) HEAD SCREW
Fixation of fracture, fusion of a joint or bone reconstruction (osteotomy) of the phalanges, metacarpals and carpals of the hand.
The SCARF Thread-Head Screw is a threaded bone fixation screw that is 3.0mm in diameter and 10 to 34mm in length (in 2mm increments). It is made of titanium alloy and is cannulated with a threaded head.
The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the SCARF Thread-Head Screw. This type of submission is for demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving safety and effectiveness through clinical trials with defined acceptance criteria and device performance.
Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding:
- Acceptance criteria and reported device performance
- Sample sizes for test sets or training sets
- Data provenance
- Number of experts or their qualifications
- Adjudication method
- Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study
- Standalone algorithm performance
- Type of ground truth used or how it was established
The document primarily focuses on:
- Device Description: A threaded bone fixation screw, 3.0mm in diameter, 10-34mm in length, made of titanium alloy, cannulated with a threaded head.
- Intended Use/Indications: Fixation of fractures, fusion of a joint, or bone reconstruction of the mid-foot, metatarsals, and phalanges of the foot. (Note: The "Indications for Use" enclosure on Page 3 lists "phalanges, metacarpals and carpals of the hand," which appears to be a discrepancy or an initial proposed indication that was then changed or clarified in the main document. For this response, I'll use the main document's stated indications).
- Predicate Devices: Landos SCARF Thread-Head Screw, Zimmer Herbert-Whipple Bone Screw, and Osteomed M3 Screw.
- Regulatory Classification: Class II, product code 87HWC.
- Substantial Equivalence Determination: The FDA determined the device is substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
Summary of what can be extracted from the document:
The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a medical device (SCARF Thread-Head Screw). In a 510(k) pathway, the primary goal is to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, not necessarily to conduct studies that prove specific performance metrics against pre-defined acceptance criteria as would be typical for a novel high-risk device or an AI/software as a medical device (SaMD) study.
Therefore, the document does not contain a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance because the submission method relies on demonstrating equivalence to existing devices rather than meeting new, explicit performance thresholds based on a study of the device itself.
The document does not contain the following requested information:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not relevant for a 510(k) submission focused on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, where performance is implicitly similar to predicates.
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: No test sets or associated data are described.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable as no ground truth for a test set is described.
- Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable, as this is a physical implant device, not an AI or software device.
- If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable.
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1