Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K070236
    Date Cleared
    2007-02-21

    (27 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3160
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SBI LATERAL RADIO CAPITELLUM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The SBI Radio-Capitellar implant is indicated for use in the elbow for reduction or relief of pain and/or improved elbow function in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteo-arthritis or traumatic arthritis; 2) inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis; 3) correction of functional deformity; 4) revision procedures where other treatments and devices have failed; and 5) treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. The SBI Lateral Assembly Radio-Capitellar implant is intended for cemented use only.

    Device Description

    The SBI Lateral Radio Capitellar Implant provides an alternative to hemi-arthroplasty of the proximal radial head. The implant is used for the treatment of degenerative joint disorders of the radio-capitellar joint allowing activities of daily living to be performed with no or significantly reduced pain. The radio-capitellar implant is designed to be used with the radial stem components of the rHead and rHead Recon stem implants cleared for market under 510(k) K011819 and K023604 respectively.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the SBI Lateral Radio Capitellum, an elbow joint prosthesis. It outlines the device's description, intended use, materials, and its substantial equivalence to previously marketed devices. However, it does not contain the information required to answer the questions about acceptance criteria and study details.

    The provided text does not include any information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, or comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC or standalone). This document is a regulatory submission for premarket notification (510(k)), which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting detailed performance study results against specific acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and study details based solely on the input given.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1