Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K063635
    Device Name
    SBI FOREFOOT SET
    Date Cleared
    2007-08-29

    (266 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SBI FOREFOOT SET

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The SBi Forefoot Set is indicated for bone fixation of the hand and foot following trauma or osteotomy.

    Device Description

    The SBi Forefoot Set consists of screws and washers that provide internal fixation of bones. The devices are supplied non-sterile and are available in various sizes and configurations.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (SBi Forefoot Set), which is a regulatory document submitted to the FDA to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This type of document does not typically contain information about specific acceptance criteria and the detailed study results you've requested regarding device performance, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or clinical comparative effectiveness studies.

    The document primarily focuses on:

    • Identifying the manufacturer and device.
    • Classifying the device and its product code.
    • Stating its intended use and materials.
    • Asserting its substantial equivalence to other legally marketed devices.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the following information from the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This information is not present. The document declares substantial equivalence, implying the device meets performance standards similar to predicates, but doesn't detail those standards or specific performance metrics.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not mentioned.
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not mentioned.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not mentioned.
    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and its effect size: Not mentioned.
    6. If a standalone performance study was done: Not mentioned.
    7. The type of ground truth used: Not mentioned.
    8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is a physical medical device (screws and washers for bone fixation), not an AI/software device that would have a "training set."
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable for the same reason as above.

    The 510(k) process for devices like the SBi Forefoot Set typically relies on mechanical testing, material specifications, and comparison to predicate devices, rather than clinical efficacy studies involving "test sets" with "ground truth" established by experts in the context of an AI/software device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1