Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K040694
    Date Cleared
    2004-03-25

    (8 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.5950
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION TO SAPPHIRE DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM (TETRIS 3-D)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Sapphire™ Detachable Coils are intended for the endovascular cmbolization of intracranial aneurysms that - because of their morphology, their location, or the patient's general medical condition - are considered by the treating neurosurgical team to be a) very high risk for management by traditional operative techniques, or b) be inoperable. The Sapphire™ Detachable Coils are also intended for the embolization of other neuro vascular abnormalities, such as, arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.

    Device Description

    The Sapphire Tetris 3-D coil is manufactured from a platinum alloy wire which is first wound into primary coil and then formed into a secondary three-dimensional structure, which forms a spherical cage of loops. The Tetris is manufactured with an inner filament made of a Nickel-Titanium. The Tetris coil is welded to a positioning wire, which consist of ground stainless steel core wire with a stainless steel coil laser welded at the distal end and a Teflon outer jacket. The coil is detached by the battery operated power supply (SDS), which dissolves a small detachment element between the emboliozation coil and the positioning wire.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the Micro Therapeutics, Inc. Sapphire Tetris 3-D Detachable Coil System.

    Here's the analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Bench TestingAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Coil DeformationEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Ease of Delivery/Coil Frictional CharacteristicsEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Reliability After Fatigue & Premature DetachmentEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Coil KnottingEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Detachment TimeEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Physical DimensionsEstablished acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria
    Physician/Marketing Laboratory Evaluation (side-by-side comparison with Atlas)Established acceptance criteriaMeet established acceptance criteria

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The provided document describes bench testing for the device, not a human clinical study with a "test set" in the context of patient data. Therefore, information about sample size for a test set, data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective), and ground truth establishment, as typically understood for clinical trials, is not applicable here. The tests were performed on the device itself.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This information is not provided as the evaluation focuses on device bench performance, not human interpretability of medical data. The "Physician/Marketing Laboratory Evaluation" suggests input from physicians, but the number and qualifications are not detailed beyond their involvement in a "side-by-side comparison with Atlas" (the predicate device).

    4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    This is not applicable as there is no test set of patient data requiring adjudication.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    An MRMC study was not performed. This submission is for a medical device (embolization coil), not an AI diagnostic or assistive tool.

    6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    A standalone performance study was not performed in the context of an algorithm. The device itself (the embolization coil) is the "standalone" component being evaluated for its physical and functional performance.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" for the bench testing would be engineering specifications and performance standards. For example, the detachment time would be compared against a defined acceptable range, and physical dimensions against design specifications.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable. There is no "training set" as this is not an AI or machine learning device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable as there is no training set mentioned or implied.


    Summary of the Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:

    The study that proves the Sapphire Tetris 3-D Detachable Coil System meets its acceptance criteria is a series of bench tests evaluating various physical and functional characteristics of the device. These tests were conducted according to established acceptance criteria, and the results consistently indicated that the device "Meet established acceptance criteria" across all assessed parameters, including:

    • Coil Deformation
    • Ease of Delivery/Coil Frictional Characteristics
    • Reliability After Fatigue & Premature Detachment
    • Coil Knotting
    • Detachment Time
    • Physical Dimensions
    • Physician/Marketing Laboratory Evaluation (side-by-side comparison with the predicate device, Sapphire Atlas 3-D)

    The purpose of these studies was to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device (Sapphire Atlas 3-D) by showing that the two devices share the same intended use, operating principle, basic design and material, and manufacturing/sterilization processes. The testing was focused on the device's inherent properties and performance, not on clinical outcomes or diagnostic accuracy involving human subjects.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K030392
    Date Cleared
    2003-07-21

    (166 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.5950
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SAPPHIRE DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Sapphire™ Detachable Coils are intended for the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms that - because of their morphology, their location, or the patient's general medical condition - are considered by the treating neurosurgical team to be a) very high risk for management by traditional operative techniques, or b) be inoperable. The Sapphire™ Detachable Coils are also intended for the embolization of other neuro vascular abnormalities, such as, arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.

    Device Description

    The Sapphire Detachable Coil (SDC) is manufactured from a platinum alloy attached to a positioning wire. The coil is detached by the Sapphire Detachment System (SDS) power supply, which dissolves a small detachment element between the emboliozation coil and the positioning wire. This occurs after desired placement of the coil in the anatomy. The Sapphire coils are manufactured from platinum/iridium alloy wire that is first wound into the primary coil, and then formed into a secondary (spherical or helical) shape. The Sapphire Detachment Coils are manufactured in different shapes and sizes. These coils are available in spherically shaped configurations, as well as, helically shaped configurations of various diameters and lengths.

    AI/ML Overview

    The Sapphire Detachable Coil System underwent various tests to demonstrate its performance and substantial equivalence to the predicate device. The Acceptance Criteria and reported performance are summarized below, though specific numerical acceptance criteria were not provided in the document for all tests. The document states that "All performance characteristics met the acceptance criteria" and "All testing demonstrated compliance with the appropriate standard and/or met the acceptance criteria," indicating successful completion of the tests.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    TestAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Mechanical Performance
    Coil Strength (force required to deform coil shape)Met unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Ease of Delivery (friction during advancement/retraction)Met unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Detachment TimeMet unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Reliability after Fatigue (10 cycles)Met unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Coil, Detachment Zone & Coil Weld Tensile StrengthMet unspecified acceptance criteriaMeasured, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Delivery Wire FlexibilityMet unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    RadiopacityMet unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Particulate GenerationMet unspecified acceptance criteriaMeasured, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Material Compatibility
    MRI CompatibilityMet unspecified acceptance criteriaEvaluated and met acceptance criteria
    Packaging & Sterility
    PackagingMet unspecified acceptance criteriaTested, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Sterile Integrity & Sterility ValidationMet unspecified acceptance criteriaTested, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Detachment System Performance (SDS)
    Conductance of CurrentMet product specificationsTested, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Compliance with Product SpecificationsMet product specificationsTested, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Detachment Reliability (in-vitro and in-vivo)Met unspecified acceptance criteriaTested, evaluated, and met acceptance criteria
    Electrical SafetyCompliant with appropriate standardTested, evaluated, and demonstrated compliance
    Radiated EmissionCompliant with appropriate standardTested, evaluated, and demonstrated compliance
    Radio DisturbanceCompliant with appropriate standardTested, evaluated, and demonstrated compliance
    Electro-Static Discharge ImmunityCompliant with appropriate standardTested, evaluated, and demonstrated compliance
    SDS Firmware (expression of modes and states)Conforms to Design SpecificationsTested, evaluated, and demonstrated compliance

    2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document describes "animal studies" for the Sapphire Detachable Coil series. However, the specific sample size (number of animals) used for these studies is not provided. The data provenance is described as prospective animal studies. The country of origin of the data is not specified.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

    The provided text does not include information on the number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications. The animal studies would rely on observations and measurements from the researchers and veterinarians involved.

    4. Adjudication Method

    The provided text does not include information on any adjudication method for the test set.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    A Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not conducted as this device is a medical implant and not an imaging or diagnostic AI device that would typically involve human readers. The studies focused on the physical and functional performance of the coil and its detachment system.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

    While the Sapphire Detachment System (SDS) includes firmware, the "standalone" performance described is not in the context of an AI algorithm producing a standalone diagnostic output. Instead, it refers to the functional performance of the SDS, including electrical safety, emission, disturbance, ESD immunity, and firmware compliance with design specifications. The performance of the coil itself is also assessed in a standalone context in the sense that its physical properties are measured independently.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used in the studies includes:

    • Physical Measurements and Standards: For tests like coil strength, tensile strength, flexibility, radiopacity, particulate generation, and electrical properties, ground truth is established by objective measurements against predefined engineering specifications and relevant industry standards.
    • In-vitro Performance Assessment: For aspects like ease of delivery, detachment time (in-vitro), and detachment reliability (in-vitro), the ground truth is based on the devices' performance in controlled laboratory settings and simulations.
    • Animal Outcomes/Observations: For the animal studies, the ground truth relates to observed physiological responses and device function within a living system, such as fluoroscopic visibility, ability to position and pack the aneurysm sac, coil reposition-ability, ease of use of the detachment system, coil detachment reliability, and coil stability.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The concept of a "training set" is typically applicable to machine learning algorithms. Since the Sapphire Detachable Coil System is a physical medical device and not an AI algorithm in the context of its development as described, there is no mention of a training set in the provided information.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    As there is no training set discussed, information on how its ground truth was established is not applicable/provided.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1