LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K983625
    Device Name
    S555 INTRAORAL DENTAL CAMERA
    Manufacturer
    SOPRO
    Date Cleared
    1999-01-11

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    EIA
    Regulation Number
    872.6640
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Provide access, illumination and allow observation or manipulation of body cavities, hollow organs and canals.

    Device Description

    SOPRO feels the S555 Dental Camera is substantially equivalent to the many marketed devices already in commercial distribution. The design of the S555 is virtually identical to the comparative devices, which are listed and displayed in Exhibit 2 and 3. Since the design is comparable, technology virtually identical, the specifications very similar, and the intended use the sames, SOPRO feels that these minors differences have no impact on the safe use and/or effectiveness of the device.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) submission for the SOPRO S555 Dental Camera does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria.

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary and the FDA's response letter. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on design, technology, specifications, and intended use. Performance data, clinical studies, or specific acceptance criteria are not detailed within this submission.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information, including:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance: Not present.
    2. Sample size, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication method for the test set: No test set performance data is described.
    3. MRMC comparative effectiveness study: Not mentioned.
    4. Standalone (algorithm only) performance: Not applicable as this is a dental camera, not an AI algorithm.
    5. Type of ground truth used: Not applicable as no performance study is detailed.
    6. Sample size for the training set: Not applicable as no AI algorithm or training is discussed.
    7. How ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

    The submission states: "SOPRO feels that these minors differences have no impact on the safe use and/or effectiveness of the device," implying that the substantial equivalence argument, rather than new performance data, is the basis for market clearance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1