Search Results

Relu Creator is a software program for the management, transfer, and analysis of dental and craniomaxillofacial image information, and can be used to provide design input for dental solutions. It displays and enhances digital images from various sources to support the diagnostic process and treatment planning. It stores and provides these images within the system or across computer systems at different locations.

The Relu Creator is a software that is part of the digital workflow of dental specialists in preoperative planning. The main purpose is the 3D modeling of the patient anatomy, which is technically called image segmentation and multimodel registration. Based on the model, simulations for preoperative and pretreatment planning can be carried out for dental applications. The 3D modeling (segmentation + registration) is performed on medical images like CBCT, IOS and FS. The preoperative/pretreatment software can be applied in various dental disciplines such as orthodontics, implantology, and maxillofacial surgery.

The provided document does not contain enough information to answer the request. The document describes the FDA's 510(k) clearance for the Relu Creator device, including regulatory details and a comparison to a predicate device. However, it does not include any specific acceptance criteria or details of a study demonstrating the device meets those criteria.

While the document states: "The Subject Device has passed testing for appropriate verification and performed per its intended use. Therefore, it can be substantially equivalent to its Predicate Devices. Based on the performance testing and software validation testing, the Subject Device, has been shown to be appropriate for its indications for use and is as safe and as effective than the legally marketed Predicate Device, DTX Studio 3.0 (K213562)," it does not provide any of the specifics requested.

Therefore, I cannot provide:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
2. Sample sizes for the test set or data provenance.
3. Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth establishment.
4. Adjudication method.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results or effect size.
6. Standalone performance details.
7. Type of ground truth used.
8. Sample size for the training set.
9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

Ask a specific question about this device