Search Results

RelieVRx is a prescription-use immersive virtual reality system intended to provide adjunctive treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy skills and other evidence based behavioral methods for patients (age 18 and older) with a diagnosis of chronic lower back-pain (defined as moderate to severe pain lasting longer than three months). The device is intended for in-home use for the reduction of pain and pain interference associated with chronic lower back pain.

RelievRx is an immersive virtual reality (VR) system with preloaded software content on a proprietary hardware platform that delivers automated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and other behavioral methods to patients diagnosed with chronic pain. The VR content is delivered while incorporating CBT to enable diaphragmatic breathing exercises and mindfulness strategies, and is intended to be self-administered, unsupervised in the patient's home while the patient is in a seated position. The device is powered by a rechargeable lithium battery. Each device is intended for a single patient. The medical device is meant for repeated use, does not include non-medical software, and is only effective when treating chronic pain.

It appears there's a misunderstanding in the request. The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for RelieVRx (Pico G3) does not contain any information about clinical performance studies, acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert involvement, or ground truth for the device's efficacy in pain relief.

This 510(k) clearance is specifically for a minor modification – the addition of a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) to allow future hardware updates (specifically to the VR headset) without requiring a new 510(k) submission, provided these changes adhere to predefined criteria and do not alter the intended use or therapeutic content.

The letter explicitly states:

• "No new nonclinical performance testing was conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence."
• "The only changes that have been made to the RelieVRx in the current submission are the addition of a Predetermined Change Control Plan to accommodate potential future updates to the device hardware."
• "Please refer to K243417 for a comprehensive description of non-clinical testing that has been completed to validate the device."

Therefore, the information regarding the device's performance in reducing pain and pain interference, and the study that would demonstrate it meets acceptance criteria for its therapeutic effect, would be found in the original 510(k) clearance for the predicate device (K243417), not in this document.

Since the provided document K251519 does not contain the requested information about clinical performance studies, I cannot fill out the requested table or answer most of the questions.

However, I can extract the relevant information from this document regarding the nature of the submission and what it does discuss:

Based on the provided FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter (K251519) for RelieVRx (Pico G3):

This 510(k) does not describe a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria for its direct therapeutic effect on pain. Instead, it's a submission for a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) to streamline future hardware modifications. Therefore, most of the requested fields related to clinical performance testing cannot be filled from this document.

Here's what can be gathered regarding the purpose of this specific 510(k) and how it addresses a "change":

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

• Acceptance Criteria: For this specific 510(k), the acceptance criteria are related to the Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP). The plan outlines that any future hardware modifications made under the PCCP must:
  • Maintain the same intended use and therapeutic content.
  • Meet predefined acceptance criteria aligned with "Table 6 of the PCCP" (which is not provided in this document). These criteria are for "safety, biocompatibility, and software performance" of the modified configurations.
  • Undergo specified verification and validation protocols (electrical and mechanical testing (IEC 60601-1/11), electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2), environmental and acoustic safety, performance benchmarking).
  • Be clearly communicated to users via updated labeling.
• Reported Device Performance (for this submission): No new clinical performance data is reported as "no new nonclinical performance testing was conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence." The substantial equivalence claim is based on the subject device being identical to the predicate (K243417) in its intended use, indications, principles of operation, and technological characteristics, with the only change being the addition of the PCCP.

Therefore, a table describing "device performance" in terms of pain relief effectiveness cannot be constructed from this document. The "performance" discussed here is adherence to a change control plan.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Not applicable for this 510(k). This submission did not involve new clinical performance testing on a test set to prove therapeutic efficacy.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:

• Not applicable for this 510(k). No clinical ground truth for therapeutic efficacy was established in this submission.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• Not applicable for this 510(k).

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:

• No, not for this 510(k). This submission focuses on a change control plan, not a comparative effectiveness study for therapeutic outcomes.

6. If a Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• No, not for this 510(k). This device is a preloaded VR system for patient self-administration, not an AI algorithm with standalone performance metrics.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

• Not applicable for this 510(k). No new clinical ground truth was established for this submission. The device's foundational efficacy would have been established in the predicate device's clearance (K243417).

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

• Not applicable for this 510(k). This submission pertains to a hardware change control plan, not the training of a new therapeutic algorithm.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:

• Not applicable for this 510(k).

Summary of what K251519 is about:
This 510(k) (K251519) is a software modification 510(k), specifically for adding a Predetermined Change Control Plan, not a clinical efficacy study for a new device or significant modification to the therapeutic content. All discussions about performance and validation in this document relate to ensuring that future hardware changes will not adversely affect the device's safety or effectiveness, building upon the substantial equivalence established by its predicate (K243417).

Ask a specific question about this device