Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(237 days)
RIWO NET OPERATING OPERATING CONTROL SYSTEM, MODEL #5590
The RIWO NET SYSTEM 5590 is used for controlling an operating system by voice control, touch screen monitor or remote control unit in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy.
The RIWO NET System 5590 provides central user control of an endoscopic operating system using either voice or remote control from the sterile area or touch screen monitor. The RI
The provided document does not contain specific acceptance criteria or a detailed study proving the device meets acceptance criteria. Instead, it is an FDA 510(k) summary for the RIWO NET Operating Control System Model #5590, demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Based on the information available in the document, here's what can be extracted and what is missing:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Not specified in document | Conforms to international standards: UL-2601-1, IEC60601-1 with A1 and A2, IEC 60601-1-1 with A1, IEC 60601-1-2. |
Not specified in document | Designed and tested to guarantee safety and effectiveness when used according to instructions manual. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: Not specified. The document states "No clinical tests performed," suggesting that performance data relies on compliance with standards rather than a specific test set based on patient data.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable, as no clinical tests or human data sets were used for performance evaluation described in this document.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- Not applicable. No clinical tests were performed, and thus no ground truth based on expert review of patient data was established or used as part of this submission.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not applicable. No clinical tests were performed.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The document explicitly states: "No clinical tests performed."
6. If a Standalone Performance Study (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- No, a standalone performance study in the context of an "algorithm only" (i.e., AI performance) was not done. The device is a control system. Its performance evaluation focused on its ability to control other endoscopic devices and compliance with safety standards, not on diagnostic or AI-driven tasks. The phrase "Compliance with international standards" (UL-2601-1, IEC60601-1, IEC 60601-1-1, IEC 60601-1-2) serves as the basis for its performance claims.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- Not applicable in the conventional sense of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy. The "ground truth" for this device's acceptance is its adherence to specified engineering and safety standards, and its functional capability to control other medical devices as intended.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. This device is an operating control system, not an AI or machine learning device that requires a training set for model development.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable. No training set or associated ground truth was relevant for this device's submission.
Summary of the Study that Proves the Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:
The document indicates that the acceptance criteria for the RIWO NET System 5590 were met through compliance with international safety and performance standards. These standards include:
- UL-2601-1
- IEC60601-1 with A1 and A2
- IEC 60601-1-1 with A1
- IEC 60601-1-2
The study proving this involved testing the device against these established standards. The device was "designed and tested to guarantee the safety and effectiveness, when used according to the instructions manual." No clinical tests were performed on human subjects or clinical data sets for this 510(k) submission, as the device's function is to control other endoscopic equipment, and its safety and effectiveness are primarily assessed through engineering principles and compliance with recognized industrial and medical device standards. The basis for substantial equivalence also relies on comparison to predicate devices with similar functionalities that have already demonstrated safety and effectiveness.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1