Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K060002
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-06-02

    (150 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    RITRACT SAFETY SYRINGE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Ritract Safety Syringe is a sterile, single-use, disposable, nonreusable, auto-retracting safety syringe which is intended for injection of fluids into the body, while reducing the risk of sharps injury and the potential for syringe reuse.

    Device Description

    The Ritract Safety Syringe is a sterile, single-use, disposable, nonreusable, 3mL, 5mL, 10ml, auto-retracting safety syringe with a standard luer lock needle connection.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided K060002 510(k) premarket notification for the Ritract Safety Syringe does not contain the specific details about acceptance criteria or a dedicated study that proves the device meets such criteria.

    This document is a 510(k) submission, which primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than conducting a detailed performance study with explicit acceptance criteria. The equivalence is primarily based on:

    • Mode of operation: The Ritract Safety Syringe and the predicate (BD Integra Spring Based Syringe K011103) both use the action of the plunger bottoming out to release a compressed spring, retracting the needle.
    • Function: Both devices are auto-retracting safety syringes intended for injecting fluids while reducing sharps injury and preventing reuse.
    • Materials used, packaging, and manufacturing processes: The document states these are also equivalent.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer most of the questions using the provided text. The submission implies that by being substantially equivalent to a predicate device, it inherently meets the performance standards expected for such devices, rather than establishing new, explicit acceptance criteria and proving them through a dedicated study within this document.

    Here's what can be inferred or explicitly stated from the document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    • Acceptance Criteria: Not explicitly stated in terms of quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate percentage for needle retraction). The implicit acceptance criterion is that the device functions to auto-retract the needle upon full plunger depression, similar to the predicate.
    • Reported Device Performance: The document states, "The Ritract Safety Syringe also uses the action of the plunger bottoming out to release the compressed spring. In the case of the Ritract Syringe the spring is held in compression by a collar system which as the plunger bottoms out the interaction of the plunger profile and the collar activates the release of the spring and draws the needle into the barrel of the syringe with no protrusion of the needle tip from the device." This describes the mechanism and successful retraction, but no quantitative performance data (e.g., 100% success rate across X number of trials) is provided in this summary.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Sample Size: Not mentioned.
    • Data Provenance: Not mentioned; no specific performance study data is included in this summary.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • Not applicable as no specific test set and ground truth establishment methodology are described in this regulatory submission.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set:

    • Not applicable.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/software device.

    7. The type of ground truth used:

    • Not applicable, as no formal ground truth for a test set is described. The "truth" in this context is the successful demonstration of the device's mechanism of action (needle retraction) as described, which is considered equivalent to the predicate.

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable, as this is not an AI/software device with a distinct training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable.

    Summary of Device and Equivalence Statement:

    The Ritract Safety Syringe is a sterile, single-use, disposable, non-reusable, 3mL, 5mL, 10mL auto-retracting safety syringe with a standard luer lock needle connection. It is indicated for the injection of fluids into the body, while reducing the risk of sharps injury and the potential for syringe reuse.

    The submission claims substantial equivalence to the BD Integra Spring Based Syringe (K011103) based on:

    • Similar mode of operation (plunger bottoming out activates a mechanism to retract the needle).
    • Similar function (auto-retracting safety syringe).
    • Similar materials, packaging, and manufacturing processes.

    The 510(k) process primarily relies on demonstrating that the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed predicate device, rather than requiring extensive de novo clinical trials or detailed performance studies with explicit, quantitative acceptance criteria in the summary document. The FDA's issuance of the 510(k) clearance (JUN - 2 2006) indicates they agreed with the substantial equivalence claim.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1