Search Results

The Rhythm of Life is a visual and audio timing device assisting individuals trained in CPR to provide effective resuscitation by conforming to the guidelines promoted by the American Heart Association in the field, clinical, and hospital settings. The Rhythm of Life is also intended for use by those in an educational setting who are in the process of learning CPR.

The Rhythm of Life by Rapid Response Solutions, LLC, is a pocket-sized metronome designed to assist both professional rescuers and trained lay rescuers in providing high quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This device is designed in accordance with the latest American Heart Association guidelines for CPR. The Rhythm of Life provides three distinctly different tones and visual feedback to prompt the rescuer to compress the patient's chest, ventilate the patient, and reassess the patient's condition every two minutes. The metronome will allow the rescuer to enter the type of patient that is being resuscitated along with other pertinent information, and then outputs proper resuscitation rates and ratios for that specific patient. Both professional and lay rescuers will benefit from additional guidance provided by the Rhythm of Life as it promotes adherence to the American Heart Association's guidelines and therefore improves the quality of patient care. The device is neither life supporting nor life sustaining.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the "Rhythm of Life" device, a CPR aid (metronome). It describes the device, its intended use, and indicates that testing was performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices and compliance with applicable standards. However, it does not include specific acceptance criteria or a detailed study report that proves the device meets those criteria in the way typically expected for a medical device's diagnostic or predictive performance.

The document focuses on regulatory compliance for device safety and effectiveness, primarily through demonstrating substantial equivalence to pre-existing devices and adherence to electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility standards. It does not describe a study to assess the device's clinical performance in terms of improving CPR outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, or similar metrics.

Therefore, for many of your requested items, the information is not present in the provided text.

Here's a breakdown of what can and cannot be answered based on the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Note: The document states that testing was "performed to demonstrate compliance" and that the device "is as safe, as effective, and performs as well to legally marketed predicate devices." However, it does not provide specific numerical results or performance metrics from these tests beyond the general statement of compliance. The focus is on regulatory and electrical standards, not clinical performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided in the document. The testing described appears to be engineering/regulatory compliance testing, not a clinical trial with patient data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not provided in the document. The device is a metronome, not a diagnostic tool requiring expert interpretation for ground truth.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not provided in the document.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

There is no indication that an MRMC or comparative effectiveness study of this nature was conducted. The device is a "CPR Aid (Metronome)" which provides visual and audio timing, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive tool where "human readers" would be involved in the sense of image or data interpretation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

The device itself is a "standalone" metronome; it doesn't involve an algorithm in the sense of AI or complex data processing that would typically be evaluated for standalone performance versus human-in-the-loop. Its primary function is timing and guidance, which is inherently "standalone" in its operation once activated. However, this is not "standalone performance" in the context of diagnostic algorithms.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

Given the nature of the device (a metronome for CPR), the concept of "ground truth" for clinical performance in the typical diagnostic sense (e.g., against pathology) is not applicable or described. The "ground truth" for this device would relate to the accuracy of its timing signals against established AHA guidelines. The document does not detail how the accuracy of these timing signals was verified beyond stating that it "met all design specifications."

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not provided and is not applicable for this type of device. The Rhythm of Life is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not provided and is not applicable for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device