Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K033423
    Date Cleared
    2004-01-15

    (80 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    REVOLIX LASER SYSTEMS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Revolix laser system and its fiber optic delivery system are intended for use in surgical procedures using open, laparoscopic and endoscopic incision, excision, resection, ablation, vaporization, coagulation and hemostasis of soft tissue in use in medical specialities including: Urology, Gasteroenterlogy, Pulmonary, Gynecology, ENT, Dermatology, Plastic Surgery and General Surgery.

    Device Description

    The RevoLix diode pump solid state is a surgical laser system operating at a wavelength of 2.0 micron. The purpose of the laser is the ablation, coagulation, and hemostasis of soft tissue. The laser is designed for open surgery and surgical applications in aqueous media. The laser power is delivered via a fiber optic delivery system and this is guided by a handpiece or endoscopic surgical instrument. It consists of Laser Console with Internal Computer Control Panel and Display, A fiber optic delivery system, Footswitch.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the RevoLix Family of Laser Systems. It describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, this document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific performance criteria.

    The 510(k) submission process primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than providing detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the manner you've described for AI/diagnostic devices. For laser systems, substantial equivalence is typically established based on similar intended use, technological characteristics, and safety profiles.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer the specific questions about acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or multi-reader multi-case studies because this information is not present in the provided document.

    The document states:

    • Rationale for Substantial Equivalence: The RevoLix laser system shares "intended use, indications for use, similar design features and functional features" with the predicate devices.
    • Conclusion: The RevoLix Laser System was found to be "substantially equivalent" to the predicate surgical laser systems.

    This type of submission focuses on regulatory comparison, not on detailed performance validation with specific acceptance criteria and study designs as would be expected for a software-as-a-medical-device (SaMD) or AI-based diagnostic tool.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1