LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K963486
    Device Name
    REVISION HIP SYSTEM
    Manufacturer
    SMITH & NEPHEW RICHARDS, INC.
    Date Cleared
    1996-11-27

    (85 days)

    Product Code
    JDI
    Regulation Number
    888.3350
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Orthopedic
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    K081124,K123598,K211176,K240783
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Revision Hip System stems are single use devices. The components are indicated for cemented and uncemented use for individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed for rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma, or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NID) or any of its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.

    Indications also include inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis secondary to a variety of diseases and anomalies, and congenital dysplasia; old, remote osteomyelitis with an extended drainage-free period; treatments of nonunion, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with heads involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques; endoprosthesis, femoral osteotomy, or Girdlestone resection of the hip; and correction of deformity.

    Device Description

    The Revision Hip System stems are single use devices. The components of the Revision Hip System have the same function as other hip systems designed for cemented and cementless fixation.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a medical device, the "Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics Revision Hip System," and its indications for use. However, it does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, or details regarding AI algorithms, ground truth, or expert involvement.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to create a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, or provide details about studies, sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, or AI-related aspects.

    The text only states that "The engineering analyses of these devices was acceptable and the components of the Revision Hip System should perform as well as other hip systems." This is a very general statement and does not provide quantifiable acceptance criteria or study results.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1