Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K111479
    Device Name
    REVERE CROSSTOP
    Date Cleared
    2011-08-17

    (82 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    REVERE CROSSTOP

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The REVERE® Stabilization System, when used as a posterior pedicle screw system, is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine: degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, pseudoarthrosis and failed previous fusion.

    In addition, the REVERE® Stabilization System is intended for treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft, having implants attached to the lumbosacral spine and/or ilium with removal of the implants after attainment of a solid fusion. Levels of pedicle screw fixation for these patients are L3-sacrum/ilium.

    When used as a posterior non-pedicle screw fixation system, the REVERE® Stabilization System is intended for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, spinal deformities (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis, Scheuermann's disease), fracture, pseudoarthrosis, tumor resection, and/or failed previous fusion. Overall levels of fixation are T1sacrum/ilium.

    When used as an anterolateral thoracolumbar system, the REVERE® Stabilization System is intended for anterolateral screw (with or without staples or staple plates) fixation for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, spinal deformities (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), fracture or dislocation of the thoracolumbar spine, pseudoarthrosis, tumor resection, and/or failed previous fusion. Levels of screw fixation are T8-L5.

    Device Description

    The REVERE® Stabilization System consists of rods, hooks, monoaxial screws, uniplanar screws, polyaxial screws, reduction screws, locking caps, t-connectors, offset housing clamps, head offset connectors, trans-iliac connectors, sacral and sacral-iliac plates, staples and staple plates, and associated manual surgical instruments. Screws and rods are available in a variety of sizes to accommodate individual patient anatomy. REVERE® implants mate with 5.5mm diameter rods; REVERE® 6.35 implants mate with 6.35mm diameter rods. Implant components can be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations for the individual patient and surgical condition. Polyaxial screws, hooks, and t-connectors are intended for posterior use only. Staples and staple plates are intended for anterior use only. Rods and monoaxial screws may be used anteriorly or posteriorly. Locking caps are used to connect screws or hooks to the rod, trans illiac connectors and sacral and sacral-iliac plates.

    The most common use of this screw, hook, and rod system in the posterior thoracolumbar and sacral spine is two rods, each positioned and attached lateral to the spinous process via pedicle screws and/or lamina, pedicle or transverse process hooks.

    The most common use of this screw, hook, and rod system in the anterior thoracolumbar spine is one rod, positioned and attached to the vertebral bodies via monoaxial screws through an appropriate size staple.

    Screws and hooks attach to the rods using a locking cap with an inner set screw. The size and number of screws are dependent on the length and location of the rod. Screws are inserted into a pedicle of the thoracolumbar and/or sacral spine. The type and number of hooks are also dependent on the location in the spine needing correction and/or stabilization. Hooks are attached to the laminae, pedicles, or transverse process of the posterior spine.

    T-connectors are modular components designed to connect the two rods of a construct and act as a structural cross member. The rod-clamping set screws secure the tconnectors to the rods. Additional set screws secure the adjustable cross members at the desired length. T-connectors from the PROTEX® system may be used with 6.5mm, 6.0mm or 5.5mm rod systems. REVERE® t-connectors may only be used with 5.5mm rods; REVERE® 6.35 t-connectors may only be used with 6.35mm rods. Additional connectors may be used to connect two rods, and are also secured using set screws.

    REVERE® hooks and T-connectors, and 5.5mm diameter rods may be used with the BEACON® Stabilization System.

    REVERE® screws and locking caps may be used with the TRANSITION® Stabilization System. Specifically, REVERE® polyaxial (solid, cannulated and dual outer diameter) screws and monoaxial screws 6.5mm diameter and larger, and 35mm length and larger, may be used with the TRANSITION® implant assemblies.

    The rods are composed of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy, or stainless steel, as specified in ASTM F136, F1295, F1472, F67, F1537 and F138. All other REVERE® implants are composed of titanium alloy or stainless steel, as specified in ASTM F136, F1295, F67 and F138. Due to the risk of galvanic corrosion following implantation, stainless steel implants should not be connected to titanium, titanium alloy, or cobalt chromium-molybdenum alloy implants.

    AI/ML Overview

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Static Compression StrengthMet or exceeded standards of ASTM F1717 and "Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s" (performance data demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate device).
    Dynamic Compression StrengthMet or exceeded standards of ASTM F1717 and "Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s" (performance data demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate device).
    Static Torsion StrengthMet or exceeded standards of ASTM F1717 and "Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s" (performance data demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate device).
    Technical CharacteristicsSimilar to predicate REVERE® Stabilization System implants.
    PerformanceSimilar to predicate REVERE® Stabilization System implants.
    Intended UseSimilar to predicate REVERE® Stabilization System implants (same classification regulation and intended use as predicate REVERE® implants).

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document does not specify a distinct "test set" in the context of clinical data for performance evaluation. The performance data is derived from mechanical testing, which typically uses physical samples of the device components.

    • Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a number of devices tested. The "Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s" and ASTM F1717 standards (mentioned) would define the number of test samples required for each mechanical test type (e.g., specific number of constructs for static and dynamic compression, and static torsion).
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable in terms of human subjects or country of origin. The data comes from standardized mechanical tests performed on the device components. This is a laboratory-based evaluation, not clinical data.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable. The performance evaluation relies on mechanical testing against recognized industry standards (ASTM F1717) and FDA guidance for spinal systems. There is no expert-established ground truth in the context of human interpretation for this type of device submission.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. This device's performance is established through mechanical testing, not through human interpretation requiring adjudication.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This document pertains to the mechanical performance and substantial equivalence of a physical medical implant (spinal fixation system), not an AI-powered diagnostic device or software. Therefore, no MRMC study or AI assistance evaluation was conducted.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" for this device's performance is the adherence to established engineering and material science standards and guidance documents. Specifically:

    • ASTM F1717: Standard Specification for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model.
    • "Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, Guidance for Spinal System 510(k)s", May 3, 2004: FDA's specific recommendations for spinal system submissions.

    The device's performance is measured against the expected mechanical properties and behaviors defined by these standards.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of machine learning for this physical medical device. The device's design and manufacturing rely on engineering principles and materials science.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth established for it.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1