LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K111270
    Device Name
    REUSABLE STIMULATING ELECTRODES
    Manufacturer
    BIO PROTECH, INC.
    Date Cleared
    2011-09-13

    (133 days)

    Product Code
    GXY
    Regulation Number
    882.1320
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Neurology
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    REUSABLE STIMULATING ELECTRODES

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Bio Protech Reusable Stimulating electrodes are intended to be used to apply electrical stimulation current to the patient's skin or to record physiological signals.

    Electrical stimulation current applications of these electrodes are:

    • Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for pain relief. a)
    • b) Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS)
    • C) Functional electrical stimulation (FES)
    • d) Microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation (MENS)
    • Interferential stimulation (IF) e)
    • f) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
    Device Description

    Reusable Stimulating Electrodes

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification decision letter from the FDA regarding a medical device called "Reusable Stimulating Electrodes." This document primarily focuses on regulatory approval and equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a detailed study evaluating the device's performance against specific acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, the information required to populate the table and answer the study-related questions (sample size, experts, ground truth, etc.) is not available in the provided text. The document is a regulatory approval, not a scientific study report.

    Here's why and what can be inferred:

    • Acceptance Criteria and Performance: The document does not list specific acceptance criteria (e.g., impedance values, lifespan, stimulating current delivery accuracy) or present performance data from a study. The FDA's review is based on substantial equivalence, implying the device performs similarly to existing, legally marketed predicate devices, but the explicit performance metrics are not detailed here.

    • Study Details (Sample Size, Experts, Ground Truth, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone, Training Set): None of this information is present. This document is a summary of the FDA's decision, not the full submission that would contain these study details. For a 510(k), manufacturers typically submit data to show their device is as safe and effective as a predicate device, which might involve bench testing, animal studies, or sometimes human clinical data depending on the device and its risk. However, the specifics of such internal studies are not part of this public letter.

    In summary, based only on the provided text, I cannot complete the requested information. The document is a regulatory approval notice and does not contain the detailed study results and acceptance criteria you're looking for.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1