Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K061903
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-08-18

    (44 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    874.4420
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    RELIEVA SINUS BALLOON CATHETER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    To provide a means to access the sinus space and to dilate the sinus ostia and spaces within the paranasal sinus cavities for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

    Device Description

    The Sinus Balloon Catheter—Integrated Wire is a sinus balloon catheter that has an integrated guidewire. The Sinus Balloon Catheter—Integrated Wire allows access to and dilation of the sinus ostia and paranasal spaces with a single device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a medical device, the "Sinus Balloon Catheter—Integrated Wire," and its 510(k) submission to the FDA. However, the document does not contain the specific details required to complete your request regarding acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them.

    The relevant section only states:

    "The Sinus Balloon Catheter—Integrated Wire met all performance testing acceptance criteria."

    And:

    "The Sinus Balloon Catheter—Integrated Wire is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices as confirmed through relevant performance tests."

    This indicates that performance testing was conducted and acceptance criteria were met, but the document does not elaborate on:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
    3. Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications.
    4. Adjudication method.
    5. Whether a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, or the effect size.
    6. Whether a standalone performance study was done.
    7. The type of ground truth used.
    8. The sample size for the training set.
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information based on the given text. This document is a summary of the 510(k) process and regulatory filing, not likely to contain detailed performance study protocols and results. Such details would typically be in an accompanying technical report or design validation documentation, which is not included here.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1