Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K082217
    Date Cleared
    2008-10-06

    (61 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5725
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    RANGER RAPID FLOW BLOOD/FLUID WARMING SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Ranger Rapid Flow blood/fluid warming system is intended to deliver warm blood, blood products, and liquids to adult and pediatric patients.

    Device Description

    The Ranger Rapid Flow blood/fluid warming system is a stand-alone system that warms fluid, detects fluid level within the bubble trap, controls a patient valve, and delivers high volumes of fluid under pressure. The warming system consists of warming plates, fluid detection, valve control, pressure infusors and a fluid warming disposable set.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Ranger Rapid Flow Blood/Fluid Warming System." This document is primarily focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than presenting a study with acceptance criteria for a new AI/diagnostic device.

    Therefore, many of the requested categories (such as acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and training set details) are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this type of regulatory submission.

    The document emphasizes that clinical tests were not necessary for the Ranger Rapid Flow blood/fluid warming system to demonstrate substantial equivalence, which further confirms the absence of the specific types of studies you've inquired about.

    Here's an attempt to fill in what information is available, and explicitly state what is not applicable or not provided:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not specify "acceptance criteria" in the typical sense of a diagnostic device's performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity). Instead, the comparison is based on technological characteristics and intended use to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices. The table provided compares features of the new device to two predicate devices.

    FeatureRanger Rapid Flow Blood/Fluid Warming SystemBair Hugger Blood/Fluid WarmerLevel 1 H-1028 Fluid Warming System
    Flow ratesKVO-1200 mL/minKVO-500 mL/minKVO-1400 mL/min
    Method of operationAluminum plate heated by electrical resistance; disposable cassette contacts platesAluminum plate heated by electrical resistance; disposable cassette contacts platesFluids warmed through a sealed heat exchanger with recirculating solution; uses water bath technology
    ElectronicsPID-controlledPID-controlledUses water bath technology controlled electronics
    Temperature ControlElectronically ControlledElectronically ControlledElectronically Controlled
    AlarmsAudible & visual under/over temperature; activate at 25°C, 45.5°C, 46°CAudible & visual under/over temperature; activate at 33°C, 43°C, 46°CAudible & visual over temperature; activate at 43.9°C
    Tubing144" long, 0.185" min ID, 0.273 max OD; Patient Line: 84" long, 0.185" min ID, 0.273 max OD144" long, 0.185" min ID, 0.273 max OD; Patient Line: 84" long, 0.185" min ID, 0.273 max OD68" long, 0.185" max ID, 0.273" min ID; Patient Line: 87" long, 0.185" min ID, 0.273 max OD
    Sterilization method100% Ethylene Oxide, reference Isomedix Soft Cycle100% Ethylene Oxide, reference Isomedix Soft Cycle100% Ethylene Oxide, reference Isomedix Soft Cycle
    Disposable packagingManufactured/assembled in filtered air; each set placed in box then sealed in polyethylene/tyvek pouchManufactured/assembled in filtered air; each set placed in box or sealed in polyethylene/tyvek pouchDisposable set placed within a box

    The general "acceptance criterion" for this 510(k) submission is that the device demonstrates substantial equivalence to existing legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics, and does not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. The conclusion states: "The Ranger Rapid Flow blood/fluid warming system has similar technological characteristics, components, and materials, and the same intended use as devices currently on the market. Therefore, because of the similarities to the predicate devices, Arizant Healthcare this new device does not raise any new safety or effectiveness issues."

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    Not applicable. The document explicitly states: "Clinical tests were not necessary regarding the use of the Ranger Rapid Flow blood/fluid warming system." This implies no formal clinical test set or data was used in the context of human patient data for this submission. The comparison is based on engineering specifications and intended use.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable. No ground truth establishment by experts for a test set is described, as clinical testing was deemed unnecessary.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. No clinical test set and thus no adjudication method is described.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is a blood/fluid warming system, not an AI or diagnostic imaging device. An MRMC study is irrelevant for this product type.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This is not an algorithm-based device requiring standalone performance evaluation.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    Not applicable. No ground truth in this context was established or used, as no clinical studies with human data were performed for this submission. The "truth" for this submission is based on the functional specifications and performance characteristics of the device being sufficiently similar to predicate devices.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device, so there is no concept of a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. As there's no training set, there's no ground truth establishment for it.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1