Search Results

The VariLink 2 MMLC is intended to assist the radiation oncologist team in the delivery of radiation to well defined target volumes while sparing surrounding normal tissue and critical organs from excess radiation. With Radionics' Treatment Planning Software, the MMLC enables static conformal treatments to be performed with finely shaped field patterns. The Varilink 2 MMLC can be used as part of IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy) or general conformal radiation.

The device is an optional accessory for the Radionics Mini-Multileaf Collimator (MMLC), mounted on a Varian C-Series Linear Accelerator (Linac). VariLink 2 allows Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) functionality to be used on a Varian Linac. The Radionics' Treatment Planning software generates treatment plans with segmented beams, in which the intensity within the irradiation field is not constant (as in conventional treatments) but varies across the field. This requires the LINAC to suspend the beam between segments to allow the MMLC to change fields. VariLink 2 uses the Varian gating board to suspend the beam to allow MMLC to change the shape of the field.

The provided text does not contain detailed acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them. The document is a 510(k) summary for the Radionics VariLink 2, which focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than detailing specific performance studies with acceptance criteria.

The relevant section {1} states: "System testing verifies that the device is ready for clinical use. A rigorous test of the functionality of VariLink 2 was conducted using a Varian C-Series Linac with the Gating Board Interface."

This statement confirms that some testing was performed to verify functionality, but it does not provide any specific acceptance criteria, performance metrics, or details about the study design or results. Without further information beyond what is present in this 510(k) summary, it is impossible to complete the requested tables and answer the questions.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information for the following reasons:

1. No Acceptance Criteria or Reported Performance: The document does not list any specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity thresholds) or the actual reported device performance against such criteria.
2. No Details on Study Design: The summary mentions "system testing" and a "rigorous test of the functionality" but provides no information on the methodology, sample size, type of data used, ground truth establishment, expert involvement, or adjudication methods.
3. No Standalone or MRMC Study Details: There is no mention of whether a standalone algorithm performance study or a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was conducted.
4. No Training Set Information: The document does not describe a training set, how its ground truth was established, or its sample size.

In summary, the provided text confirms that functional testing was done but lacks the specific details required to answer your questions comprehensively.

Ask a specific question about this device