Search Results

The ProTom Radiance 330 is a medical device designed to produce and deliver a proton beam for the treatment of patients with localized tumors and other conditions susceptible to treatment by radiation.

The Radiance 330 consists primarily of Beam Delivery and Beam Production systems. These systems are comprised of various components and/or accessories designed to produce and deliver a proton beam appropriate for patient treatment. The system components include:

• Beam Production System. This system produces the proton beam and directs it to the appropriate treatment room and is comprised of the following subsystems:
  • Synchrotron subsystem. The accelerator unit is the source of the proton beam and is composed of the injector (which generates the proton beam) and the synchrotron (which accumulates, accelerates, and extracts the proton beam).
  • Beam Transport subsystem. This subsystem guides the proton beam extracted from the synchrotron to the treatment room.
• Beam Delivery System. This system controls the irradiation dose and shapes the proton beam supplied through the beam transportation system into the configuration required for patient treatment, and directs the beam appropriately. It is comprised of the following subsystems:
  • Scan/Dose subsystem
  • Gantry subsystem
  • Patient Positioning subsystem.
  • Treatment Delivery Control subsystem

The provided text describes the ProTom Radiance 330™ Proton Beam Therapy System, but it is not an AI diagnostic device. It is a medical device for delivering proton beam radiation therapy. As such, the concept of "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of diagnostic performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC) is not applicable here.

Instead, the performance data presented focuses on the functional aspects of the device in delivering radiation therapy rather than a diagnostic performance study.

Here's a breakdown of the information that is available, reframed to fit the device's purpose:

1. Table of System Specifications and Demonstrated Performance (Conceptual - Based on text)

The document states, "All testing demonstrated that the system met its specifications for its intended use." However, it does not provide a specific table of numerical acceptance criteria or reported performance values (e.g., beam uniformity, dose accuracy to a specific tolerance). It describes the types of performance evaluated.

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable in the context of a diagnostic dataset. The "testing" refers to verification and validation of the physical system's operation. No information on the number of "cases" or "patients" used for testing is provided, as the testing focuses on hardware performance, not diagnostic accuracy.
• Data Provenance: Not applicable. The testing is likely internal to the manufacturer (ProTom International Inc.) and conducted on the device itself, rather than using patient data from a specific country or being retrospective/prospective in a diagnostic sense.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth:

• Not applicable as this is not a diagnostic device requiring expert consensus for ground truth on images or patient outcomes in the same way. The ground truth for operational performance would be established by engineering specifications and metrology standards.

4. Adjudication Method for Test Set:

• Not applicable. This concept is typically related to diagnostic reviews where multiple human readers assess a case.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

• Not applicable. This is a study design for evaluating the impact of AI on human reader performance in diagnostic tasks. The ProTom Radiance 330™ is a treatment delivery device, not an AI diagnostic tool.

6. Standalone Performance Study:

• Yes, a standalone performance was done for the device itself (as opposed to an algorithm). The document explicitly states: "Each individual subsystem of the Radiance 330™ was verified and validated, and full system verification and validation was also performed." This refers to the operational performance of the machine and its components.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

• The ground truth for the device's functional performance would be engineering specifications, physical measurements, and internationally recognized safety/performance standards (e.g., IEC 60601-1). For example, a "designated dose" would have a specified target value, and the device's output would be measured against that.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

• Not applicable. This device is not an AI algorithm that undergoes "training" on a dataset. The components are engineered and tested, not "trained."

9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

• Not applicable for the same reason as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device