Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K231684
    Date Cleared
    2024-01-12

    (217 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Quick - Radius Disposable Set

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Quick - Radius Disposable Set is intended for fracture fixation, arthrodesis, reconstruction, and osteotomy fixation of the hand and wrist. The use of locking plate and screw systems is suited for treatment of fractures in osteopenic bone.

    Device Description

    Quick - Radius Disposable Set are plate and instruments kit, for osteosynthesis procedures of the distal radius, in sterile condition, single use and disposable instruments after use. This sterile set must be used with 2.4mm screws, also sterile and individually packaged. The surgeon selects the best combination of plate size, left or right and screw designs and quantities, as needed. Single use and sterile templates are available, individually packed, for determining the size of the plate to be used. Also, as an option, individually packed plates, instruments only kit, and instruments with plates and screws kit, are available in sterile condition.

    The plates and screws are produced with Titanium Alloy, according with standard ASTM F136, and the instruments are made of Stainless Steel, according with standard ASTM F899.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a medical device, the "Quick - Radius Disposable Set." The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, rather than presenting a performance study against specific acceptance criteria for a novel device or an AI/algorithm-based diagnostic tool.

    Therefore, the information required to populate the fields related to acceptance criteria, specific performance metrics, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and training set details for an AI/algorithm-based device is not present in the provided text.

    The document states:

    • "The proposed device is a line extension to the predicate device with new presentation forms." (Page 3, Section VI)
    • "The proposed and predicate devices have the same basic design, intended use and biocompatibility profile." (Page 3, Section VI)
    • "Difference between the proposed device and the predicate includes addition of a presentation form in a sterile condition." (Page 3, Section VI)
    • "The subject Quick - Radius Disposable Set components possess the same technological characteristics as the predicate devices. These include: performance, shape and dimensions, material and manufacturing, sizes, biocompatibility and device usage." (Page 3, Section VII)
    • "The EO sterilization has been validated to a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6, according to ISO 11135" (Page 3, Section VII)
    • "Any differences between the proposed device and the predicate device are considered minor and do not raise new or different questions concerning safety or effectiveness." (Page 3, Section VI and Page 4, Section VIII)

    In conclusion, this submission is for a physical medical device (bone plates and screws set) seeking 510(k) clearance based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, mainly through demonstrating equivalent design, materials, and a validated sterilization process. It does not involve software, AI, or diagnostic claims that would necessitate the types of performance studies and acceptance criteria typically associated with those technologies.

    Therefore, I cannot fill in the requested table and answer the specific questions about "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of an AI/algorithm, as the provided text does not contain such information. The "performance data" section in the document (Section VII) refers to the performance of the physical components (e.g., mechanical performance, biocompatibility) rather than diagnostic accuracy metrics.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1