Search Results

QLAB Quantification Software is a software application package. It is designed to view and quantify image data acquired on Philips Healthcare ultrasound products.

The QLAB software application is available either as a stand-alone product that can function on a standard PC, a dedicated workstation, and on-board Philips' ultrasound systems. It can be used for the on-line and off-line review and quantification of ultrasound studies. QLAB Quantification software now includes the Heart Model application. The Heart Model application provides automatic 3D anatomical segmentation and identification of the heart chambers for the End Diastole (ED) and End Systole (ES) cardiac phases. The Heart Model segmentation algorithm draws segmented borders for select standard American Society of Echocardiology (ASE) apical and short axis views. This provides a streamlined workflow for obtaining cardiac 3D quantitative heart chamber measurements and calculated result values.

Here's an analysis of the QLAB Quantification Software with Heart Model based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided text does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in terms of specific performance metrics or thresholds. Instead, it mentions that the device was "clinically evaluated and accepted" and that "the LA and LV chamber measurements correlated to cardiac MRI." This suggests that the primary acceptance criterion was a demonstrated correlation with a gold standard (cardiac MRI) for key measurements, and a general confirmation that the device "met its intended use."

Without specific numerical acceptance criteria from the document, we can infer the reported performance based on the general statements:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify the sample size for the clinical evaluation (external validation) during which external clinicians evaluated the functionality and performance of Heart Model.
• Data Provenance: The document states "External clinicians evaluated the functionality and performance of Heart Model." This suggests prospective data collection during the clinical evaluation, but it doesn't specify the country of origin of the data.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

• Number of Experts: Unspecified. The document states "External clinicians evaluated the functionality and performance of Heart Model." This implies multiple clinicians, but a specific number is not given.
• Qualifications of Experts: Unspecified. They are referred to as "external clinicians," but their specific specialties or years of experience are not provided.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

The document does not describe a formal adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1). It states "External clinicians evaluated the functionality and performance of Heart Model," implying a consensus or individual evaluation, but no specific process for resolving discrepancies is detailed.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study evaluating the improvement of human readers with AI assistance versus without AI assistance was not explicitly mentioned or described in the provided text. The study focused on the standalone performance of the Heart Model and its correlation with cardiac MRI.

6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

Yes, a standalone performance evaluation was done. The document states: "The Heart Model application provides automatic 3D anatomical segmentation and identification of the heart chambers..." and "QLAB Heart Model finds the chambers of the Heart and then displays the Heart Model determined chamber borders in the ASE/ESE views for the user to Accept or Reject." The clinical evaluation compared the device's generated measurements to cardiac MRI, implying an assessment of the algorithm's raw output before user interaction. The statement about "LA and LV chamber measurements correlated to cardiac MRI" refers to the output of the Heart Model algorithm.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The primary type of ground truth used for the comparison was cardiac MRI measurements for Left Atrial (LA) and Left Ventricular (LV) chamber measurements. This is considered a highly reliable imaging modality for cardiac quantification.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

The document does not provide the sample size used for the training set. It mentions that the QLAB Heart Model algorithm is "reused from Philips Brilliance CT (K042293), but modified for ultrasound," suggesting prior training on CT data and potential further training/adaptation for ultrasound, but no specifics are given.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

The document does not provide information on how the ground truth for the training set was established. Given the algorithm's origin from Philips Brilliance CT and adaptation for ultrasound, it's plausible that ground truth was established by expert annotation or comparison to established methods on CT and subsequently on ultrasound data, but this is not explicitly detailed.

Ask a specific question about this device