Search Results

Not Found

Not Found

I am sorry, but based on the provided text, I cannot provide a description of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them. The document is a 510(k) substantial equivalence determination letter from the FDA to Toaster Labs, Inc. regarding their Pulse™ Aloe-ahh product (a condom).

This letter states that the device has been reviewed and determined to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. However, it does not contain any information regarding specific acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, study design (sample size, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods), or details about standalone/MRMC studies or ground truth establishment.

The letter is primarily focused on regulatory compliance and the substantial equivalence determination, not the specific technical details or performance study results.

Ask a specific question about this device