Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(252 days)
Power Wheelchair (N5909)
The Power Wheelchair (N5909) is a motor driven, indoor transportation vehicle with the intended use to provide mobility to a disabled or elderly person limited to a seated position.
This Power wheelchair, N5909, is a motor driven, indoor transportation vehicle, which a device for assisting action handicapped people and disabled people to move. It is suitable for disabled people with mobility difficulties. The device consists of front wheel, drive wheel, frame, controller, motor, armrest, push-handle, backrest, seat cushion, footrest, battery box and charger.
The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a Power Wheelchair (N5909) and establishes its substantial equivalence to a predicate device (K220747). The acceptance criteria are based on various performance standards and safety evaluations, with the study demonstrating compliance through non-clinical testing.
Here's the breakdown of the information requested:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are generally established by compliance with a comprehensive set of ISO and IEC standards for wheelchairs. The reported device performance is demonstrated by the successful completion of tests adhering to these standards, ensuring the subject device meets or exceeds the specifications of the predicate device for relevant attributes.
Acceptance Criteria (Standard & Performance Aspect) | Reported Device Performance (Compliance/Value) |
---|---|
Stability (Static) (ISO 7176-1:2014) | Complies with ISO 7176-1:2014 |
Stability (Dynamic) (ISO 7176-2:2017) | Complies with ISO 7176-2:2017 |
Brake Effectiveness (ISO 7176-3:2012) | Complies with ISO 7176-3:2012 |
- Braking distance | ≤1.5 m (Same as Predicate) |
Energy Consumption/Range (ISO 7176-4:2008) | Complies with ISO 7176-4:2008 |
- Maximum distance of travel | 10 km (Predicate: 20 km; noted as not raising new safety concerns) |
Dimensions, Mass, Maneuvering Space (ISO 7176-5:2008) | Complies with ISO 7176-5:2008 |
- Turning Radius | 900 mm (Same as Predicate) |
- Overall Dimension (LWH) | 900mmX580mmX860mm (Minor difference from Predicate, validated with max rated weight dummy) |
- Stowage Dimension (LWH) | 900mmX250mmX860mm (Different from Predicate) |
Speed (Max, Accel, Decel) (ISO 7176-6:2018) | Complies with ISO 7176-6:2018 |
- Max speed forward | Up to 6 km/h (1.68 m/s), adjustable (Minor difference from Predicate: 1.6 m/s) |
- Max Speed backward | 0.71 m/s (2.556 km/h) (Minor difference from Predicate: 0.5 m/s) |
Seating/Wheel Dimensions (ISO 7176-7:1998) | Complies with ISO 7176-7:1998 |
- Front wheel size/type | 7" x 1.5"/PU Solid tire (Same as Predicate) |
- Rear wheel size/type | 8.5"x 1.8"/ PU Solid tire (Same as Predicate) |
Static, Impact, Fatigue Strength (ISO 7176-8:2014) | Complies with ISO 7176-8:2014 |
- Maximum obstacle climbing | 40 mm (Same as Predicate) |
- Maximum safe operational incline degree | 9 ° (Same as Predicate) |
- Max loading weight | 110kg (~250lbs) (Different from Predicate: ~300lbs; noted as not causing different performance due to lower pressure) |
Climatic Tests (ISO 7176-9:2009) | Complies with ISO 7176-9:2009 |
Obstacle-climbing ability (ISO 7176-10:2008) | Complies with ISO 7176-10:2008 |
Test Dummies (ISO 7176-11:2012) | Complies with ISO 7176-11:2012 |
Coefficient of Friction (ISO 7176-13:1989) | Complies with ISO 7176-13:1989 |
Power and Control Systems (ISO 7176-14:2008) | Complies with ISO 7176-14:2008 |
Information Disclosure/Labeling (ISO 7176-15:1996) | Complies with ISO 7176-15:1996 |
Resistance to Ignition (Seating) (ISO 16840-10:2021) | Complies with ISO 16840-10:2021 (Predicate met ISO 7176-16) |
EM Compatibility (ISO 7176-21:2009) | Complies with ISO 7176-21:2009 |
Set-up Procedures (ISO 7176-22:2014) | Complies with ISO 7176-22:2014 |
Batteries and Chargers (ISO 7176-25:2013) | Complies with ISO 7176-25:2013 |
- Battery type | Li-ion battery pack; 24 VDC 10Ah (Predicate: *2pcs; capacity difference not a safety concern) |
- Battery charger | Off-board charger (Same as Predicate) |
Electromagnetic Compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2:2014) | Complies with IEC 60601-1-2:2014 |
Biocompatibility (Cytotoxicity) (ISO 10993-5:2009) | Complies with ISO 10993-5:2009 |
Biocompatibility (Sensitization/Irritation) (ISO 10993-10:2010) | Complies with ISO 10993-10:2010 |
Risk Analysis | Developed in accordance with ISO 14971:2019 |
Software Validation | Completed (For control system) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not explicitly state the sample size for the test set used for the performance testing. The provenance of the data is non-clinical bench testing, conducted according to various international standards (ISO, IEC). The location of the testing is not specified, but the manufacturer is based in China. The testing is implicitly prospective in the sense that the new device was subjected to these tests to demonstrate compliance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for a power wheelchair's performance is established by objective engineering measurements against defined international standards (ISO, IEC). It does not involve expert interpretation or clinical judgment in the same way an AI diagnostic device would require.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in clinical studies where expert consensus is needed to establish a "ground truth" for medical images or diagnoses. For a physical device like a power wheelchair, adherence to predefined measurement procedures and standards is the primary method of evaluation.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This type of study is relevant for AI image analysis or diagnostic tools, not for the regulatory clearance of a physical medical device like a powered wheelchair.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This information is not applicable. "Standalone" performance refers to AI algorithms operating without human intervention for diagnostic or analytical tasks. The device in question is a physical power wheelchair; its "performance" is its mechanical and electrical function, not an algorithm's output. Software validation was performed, but it's not "algorithm only" performance in the context of an AI diagnostic.
7. The type of ground truth used
The ground truth used is primarily objective engineering measurements and adherence to international performance standards (ISO, IEC). For example, braking distance is measured directly, not subject to expert consensus. Biocompatibility is determined by standardized laboratory tests.
8. The sample size for the training set
The concept of a "training set" is not applicable here because this is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training phase.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1