Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K191976
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2019-11-13

    (112 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5570
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Piper GO-IO Intraosseous Infusion System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Piper GO-IO® Intraosseous Infusion System provides intraosseous access in the proximal tibia, distal tibia and humeral head (proximal humerus) of adult and pediatric patients, and the distal femur in pediatric patients when intravenous access is difficult or impossible to obtain in emergent, urgent, or medically necessary cases for up to 24 hours.

    Device Description

    The Piper GO-IO® Intraosseous Infusion System provides clinicians and emergency personnel with access to the intraosseous space for resuscitation and lifesaving fluid delivery for up to 24 hours. The Piper GO-IO® Intraosseous Infusion System consists of the following:

    • a single use hypodermic needle (with needle safety cap), ●
    • a powered or manual driver to assist with needle insertion, ●
    • an extension set, and;
    • an adhesive-backed securement dressing.

    For insertions using the powered driver, the hypodermic needle hub that mates with a stylet connected to a drive adapter hub. The drive adapter hub includes a magnetic insert that attaches to the powered driver prior to needle insertion. The Piper GO-IO® Powered Driver is a hand-held, batterypowered device with a rechargeable lithium battery used to assist in the insertion of the subject device needle through the bone cortex. The assembly of the hypodermic needle and stylet with connected drive adapter hub is referred to as the needle set.

    For insertions using the manual driver, the needle and the needle hub mate with a stylet in the same way as the needle set that is used with the powered driver, except the stylet is integrated into the handle of the manual driver instead of a drive adaptor hub (i.e. the manual driver needle assembly does not include a drive adapter hub).

    The stylet was designed to include a passive safety feature to protect the placer from sharps injury. After the needle is inserted, the stylet is separated from the needle and needle hub. Upon separation of the stylet from the needle hub, the passive safety feature is released onto the stylet tip and can be safely discarded into a sharps container. Following needle insertion, the securement dressing can be applied to secure the needle hub to the skin. An extension set is available for access to the needle hub to support fluid exchange.

    The subject device Piper GO-IO® Intraosseous Infusion System will be offered in needle set (for use with the powered driver) and manual driver needle kit configurations. Each kit configuration will include a securement dressing and an extension set.

    AI/ML Overview

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The provided document details various performance tests conducted on the Piper GO-IO® Intraosseous Infusion System. For most entries, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the standard followed (e.g., ISO 9626:2016 for Needle Outer Diameter) and the "reported device performance" is stated as "met all predetermined acceptance criteria" within the "Summary of Substantial Equivalence" section. Specific quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed performance results are not provided in this document for individual tests.

    Therefore, a table cannot be constructed with explicit quantitative acceptance criteria and reported device performance for each test. However, a summary table indicating the tests performed and the general outcome can be presented:

    Performance Test CategoryStandard FollowedReported Device Performance
    Needle Set Kit and Manual Driver Kit TestsVarious ISO standards and Internal ProtocolsMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Outer Diameter (OD)ISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Effective Needle LengthISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle LubricityISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle CleanlinessISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle to Hub Assembly TensileInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Stylet to Drive Adapter Hub TensileInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle and Stylet Disassembly ForceISO 23908: 2011Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Safety ActivationFDA Guidance for Sharps Injury Prevention Features & ISO 23908: 2011Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Stylet Safety Override (force to failure)ISO 23908: 2011Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Securement Dressing - Pinch ForceInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Securement Dressing – Peel StrengthInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Securement Dressing – Liner RemovalInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Manual Driver Hub to Stylet TensileInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Cannula Needle Resistance to CorrosionISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Cannula Needle Surface FinishISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Surface Finish and Visual AppearanceISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Hub LuerISO 594-1: 1986 and ISO 594-2: 1998Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Hub CleanlinessISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle PointISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Resistance to BreakageISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle StiffnessISO 9626: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Gravity Flow RateInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Liquid Leak Needle HubInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Limits for Acidity or Alkalinity (Needle)ISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Limits for Extractable Metals (Needle)ISO 7864: 2016Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Depth MarkingsInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Chemical ResistanceInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle DurabilityInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Manual DrillingInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Packaging Integrity and Seal StrengthISO 11607-1:2006, ASTM F88/F88M: 2015, ASTM F1886/F1886M: 2016, ASTM F1929: 2015Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Sharps Injury Prevention Feature (in Simulated Clinical Use)FDA Guidance for Sharps Injury Prevention Features & ISO 23908: 2011Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Powered Drill Performance TestsVarious IEC/ANSI/Internal StandardsMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Needle Set CouplingInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Battery Capacity/IndicatorInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Battery Usable LifeInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Battery Indicator / State of ChargeInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Drill High Temperature Shut DownInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Use LifeInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Duty CycleInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Motor Stall/Stuck ShutoffInternal Protocol/StandardMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    UsabilityIEC 60601-1-6: 2013Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic CompatibilityANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012, A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012, A2:2010/(R)2012; IEC 60601-1-2: 2014; IEC 60601-1-12: 2014; IEC 62133: 2012Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Firmware Verification and ValidationGuidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical DevicesMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Sterilization, Packaging, and Shelf-Life TestsVarious ISO standards and ASTMMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Sterilization Validation/AdoptionISO 11135:2014Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Packaging/Shelf-Life ValidationsISO 11607-1 AMD 1: 2014; ASTM F88/F88M: 2015; ASTM F1886/F1886M: 2016; ASTM F1929: 2015Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    ResidualsISO 10993-7: 2008Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Bacterial EndotoxinUSP
    USPMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Biocompatibility TestsISO 10993 seriesMet all predetermined acceptance criteria
    CytotoxicityISO 10993-05: 2009Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    SensitizationISO 10993-10: 2010Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Irritation/Intracutaneous ReactivityISO 10993-10: 2010Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Acute Systemic ToxicityISO 10993-11: 2006Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    Material Mediated PyrogenicityISO 10993-11: 2006Met all predetermined acceptance criteria
    HemocompatibilityISO 10993-4: 2017Met all predetermined acceptance criteria

    2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not provide specific sample sizes for the test sets (e.g., number of needles, drivers, or tests performed on each). The provenance of the data is not specified; it refers to "performance tests completed on the subject device system" and implies the data was generated internally as part of the regulatory submission. There is no information regarding country of origin or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective beyond the stated date of preparation of the summary (November 8, 2019).

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

    This information is not applicable. The device is a medical instrument (intraosseous infusion system), and the performance testing described is engineering and biological in nature, evaluating physical and material properties, and adherence to established standards. It does not involve diagnostic interpretation or human reader performance that would require experts to establish ground truth in the context of image analysis or similar AI/algorithm-driven tasks.

    4. Adjudication Method for Test Set

    This information is not applicable, as the performance tests are objective engineering and biological assessments against established standards, not subjective interpretations requiring adjudication.

    5. Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The document describes premarket notification for a medical device, which typically involves demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through engineering, biocompatibility, and performance testing, rather than comparative effectiveness studies with human readers and AI.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

    No standalone (algorithm only) performance study was done. The device is a physical medical instrument, not an AI or software algorithm.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the performance tests outlined in the document is established by adherence to recognized international and national standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM, FDA guidance, USP) and internal protocols. These standards define the methods, parameters, and acceptable ranges for various tests related to material properties, mechanical performance, electrical safety, biocompatibility, and sterilization.

    8. Sample Size for Training Set

    This information is not applicable. The device is a hardware medical device, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable, as there is no training set for a hardware medical device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1