Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K020115
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2002-02-28

    (48 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3750
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PULPDENT SEALANT/PASTE ORTHODONTIC BRACKET ADHESIVE SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    PULPDENT Sealant/Paste Orthodontic Bracket Adhesive System is a self-cure, two-paste dental adhesive used with a self-cure, two-part sealant to adhere orthodontic brackets to tooth surfaces.

    Device Description

    PULPDENT Sealant/Paste Orthodontic Bracket Adhesive System is a self-cure, two-paste dental adhesive used with a self-cure, two-part sealant to adhere orthodontic brackets to tooth surfaces.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental adhesive system. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, study design, or performance metrics in the way one would describe for an AI/ML medical device. This document is for a traditional physical medical device (Pulpdent Sealant/Paste Orthodontic Bracket Adhesive System) and therefore the questions in the prompt, which are tailored for AI/ML device evaluations, are not applicable.

    Here's why the questions are not relevant and what information is provided:

    • Acceptance Criteria/Reported Device Performance: The document states the device is "substantially equivalent in composition and intended use to the products listed above." This is the primary "acceptance criterion" for a 510(k) submission for a non-AI device – demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. There are no specific performance metrics (like sensitivity, specificity, AUC) reported because it's a materials science question rather than an diagnostic/AI performance question.
    • Sample Size, Data Provenance, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone Performance, Ground Truth (for test/training sets): These concepts are fundamental to evaluating AI/ML models. They are entirely absent and irrelevant for a physical adhesive product. The "safety and effectiveness" section refers to general usage of dental restorative materials over 20 years, indicating a high benefit-to-risk ratio, and mentions that predicate products have received 510(k) approval. This is not a study in the context of AI/ML validation but rather a statement supporting general safety based on historical use of similar materials.
    • Training Set Sample Size/Ground Truth: Not applicable for a physical device.

    In summary, the provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a traditional dental adhesive and does not contain the information required to answer your specific questions related to AI/ML device evaluation.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1