Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K994182
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2000-02-23

    (75 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3260
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PULPDENT CAVITY PREPARATION 1, PULPDENT CAVITY PREPARATION 1 WITH FLUORIDE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I is used by the dental professional as one step in the preparation of teeth for veneers, inlays, crowns, onlays, amalgam and composite resin restorations.

    Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I, an aqueous solution of the disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dihydrate and benzalkonium chloride, cleans and moistens tooth structure to facilitate bonding with adhesives that require moist surfaces. It can also be used prior to sealing dentin tubules. Recent studies have suggested that this step reduces micro leakage sensitivity in teeth undergoing treatment or restoration. Pulpdent makes no claim as to the antimicrobial effect of benzalkonium chloride.

    Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I with Fluoride has the advantage of increased stability from the addition of sodium fluoride. Pulpdent makes no therapeutic claim with regard to the addition of sodium fluoride.

    Device Description

    Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I, an aqueous solution of the disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid dihydrate and benzalkonium chloride

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided documents, K994182, are a 510(k) clearance letter and an Indications for Use statement for the "Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I" device. These documents do not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert reviews as typically found in a clinical study report for an AI/software device.

    The 510(k) clearance process focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously marketed predicate device, rather than proving efficacy or performance through robust clinical trials with specific acceptance criteria as you've requested for an AI device.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from these documents. The questions you've posed are generally applicable to the evaluation of AI/ML-driven medical devices, which typically undergo more rigorous performance testing and clinical validation studies than what is outlined in a traditional 510(k) for a chemical preparation like the Pulpdent Cavity Preparation I.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1