Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K971912
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-11-03

    (206 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PROTEGE ER:YAG LASER SYSTEM AND ACCESSORIES

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Protégé and Protégé LP Er: YAG Laser Systems and accessories are indicated for incision/excision, ablation, and coagulation (hemostasis) of soft tissue which may be encountered in surgical procedure includes skin, subcutaneous tissue, striated and smooth muscle, mucous membrane, lymph vessels and nodes, organs and glands and specifically for the following indications. Specific surgical specialties include:

    Dentistry
    Soft tissue (incision, excision, ablation and coagulation)

    Dermatology and Plastic Surgery
    Epidermal nevi, telangiectasia, spider veins, actinic cheilitis, keloids, verrucae, skin tags, anal tags, keratoses, scar revision, debulking benign tumors, decubitis ulcers Oral/Maxillofacial (benign oral tumor, oral and glossal lesions and gingivectomy) Ear Nose & Throat (ENT), Head and Neck Surgery

    GI, GU, GYN and Pulmonary Surgery
    Orthopedic Surgery
    Thoracic Surgery
    Ophthalmology
    Podiatry
    General Surgery

    Device Description

    Protégé and Protégé LP Er: YAG Laser Systems and Accessories

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the Protégé and Protégé LP Er:YAG Laser Systems and Accessories, dated November 3, 1997. It explicitly states that the devices are substantially equivalent to pre-amendments devices.

    Therefore, this document does not contain information related to specific acceptance criteria, device performance studies, or AI/software validation as presented in the request.

    The concept of "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" as detailed in the prompt (e.g., sample size, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, standalone performance) typically applies to more modern submissions, especially for AI/ML-driven devices, or devices requiring more extensive clinical evidence beyond substantial equivalence to a predicate.

    Thus, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1