Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(177 days)
The powdered vinyl patient examination glove, clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The powder is made from cornstarch. It is color free and is sold as non sterile.
Powdered vinyl patient examination gloves, clear (non-colored) are made of polyvinyl chloride, and are non sterile that meets all of the requirements of ASTM standard D 5250-06, except for sterility requirements. The powder is made from cornstarch. The gloves are color free.
The provided text describes the performance of "Powdered Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)" (or other clients private labeling) to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a device that employs AI or requires complex studies. Therefore, many of the requested categories (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication method, MRMC studies, standalone performance, type of ground truth for training) are not applicable to this type of device submission.
The acceptance criteria and device performance are based on meeting established consensus standards for patient examination gloves.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Description | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Dimension | Meets ASTM D5250-06 | Meets ASTM D5250-06 |
| Physical Property | Meets ASTM D5250-06 | Meets ASTM D5250-06 |
| Free of Pinhole | Meets ASTM D5151-06 | Meets ASTM D5151-06 |
| Residue Powder | Meets ASTM D6124-06 (< 10 mg/dm²) | Meets ASTM D6124-06 (< 10 mg/dm²) |
| Primary Skin Irritation | No skin irritation (ISO 10993-10) | No skin irritation |
| Dermal Sensitization | No dermal sensitization (ISO 10993-10) | No dermal sensitization |
Study Proving Acceptance Criteria:
The study proving the device meets the acceptance criteria consisted of non-clinical tests conducted following the recommended procedures outlined in the respective consensus standards. The summary explicitly states: "Tests were conducted following the recommended procedures outlined in the respective consensus standards, and results for powdered Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) (or other clients private labeling), manufactured by "Wealth On (Jiangsu) Gloves Co., Ltd" met all relevant requirements in the test standards, and are comparable to the predicate device."
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Sample Size: Not specified in the provided text. For medical devices like examination gloves, testing a statistically representative sample size according to the relevant ASTM or ISO standards is implied.
- Data Provenance: The tests were conducted by the manufacturer, Wealth On (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, located in Jiangsu Province, China. The data would therefore be prospective from the manufacturer's testing process.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
This is not applicable as the "ground truth" for this device is determined by objective, standardized physical and biocompatibility tests (e.g., measuring dimensions, tensile strength, freedom from pinholes, or observing skin reactions) as defined by the ASTM and ISO standards, not by expert consensus on interpretation.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
Not applicable. Performance is determined by objective technical measurements against defined standard thresholds, not by human adjudication of ambiguous findings.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted device, nor does it involve human readers or diagnostic interpretation.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
The ground truth is based on established consensus standards (ASTM D5250-06, ASTM D5151-06, ASTM D6124-06, and ISO 10993-10) which define the physical, performance, and biocompatibility requirements for patient examination gloves.
8. The sample size for the training set:
Not applicable. This device does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not applicable. This device does not have a "training set" or a ground truth established for it in that manner. The "ground truth" for its performance is determined by adherence to the aforementioned objective industry standards.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1