Search Results

A PATIENT EXAMINATION GLOVE IS A DISPOSABLE DEVICE INTENDED FOR MEDICAL PURPOSE THAT IS WORN ON THE EXAMINER'S HAND OR FINGER TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION BETWEEN PATIENT AND EXAMINER.

POWDER NITRILE MEDICAL EXAMINATION GLOVE, WHITE COLOR

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a "Powdered Nitrile Medical Examination Glove, Trade Name: White Color." It indicates that the device has been found substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

The request asks for information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving those criteria are met for a device, but the provided document is a regulatory clearance for a nitrile glove. The information typically requested regarding acceptance criteria, sample sizes for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, and MRMC/standalone studies are all relevant to diagnostic or AI/ML-based devices.

Nitrile medical examination gloves are subject to performance standards related to barrier integrity (e.g., freedom from holes), tensile strength, and elongation, which are typically assessed through recognized consensus standards (like ASTM D6319 for nitrile gloves) and not through the kind of studies (e.g., MRMC, expert consensus for ground truth) described in the prompt.

Therefore, the provided document does not contain the type of information requested for a diagnostic or AI/ML device. It focuses on regulatory clearance for a Class I medical device (gloves) based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, as opposed to performance studies against specific acceptance criteria for complex diagnostic tasks.

To directly answer the prompt based only on the provided context, I would have to state that the requested information is not present. If I were to interpret the "acceptance criteria" through the lens of a regulatory submission for a glove, it would be about meeting recognized standards for physical properties, but the document doesn't detail the study that proves those criteria.

Based on the provided text, I cannot extract the requested information. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter for a medical examination glove, which is a Class I device. The type of detailed performance criteria, study designs (like MRMC, standalone), sample sizes for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement described in the prompt are not applicable or present in this regulatory clearance for a basic medical device like a glove.

The clearance states the device is "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices, meaning it performs as safely and effectively. The "indications for use" provided simply state the glove's purpose: "to prevent contamination between patient and examiner." This does not involve complex performance metrics for diagnostic accuracy.

Ask a specific question about this device