Search Results

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

The subject device is disposable medical PVC gloves that made from PVC compound, Clear (non-colored), powder free and nonsterile. The device meets the specifications in ASTM D5250-06(Reapproved 2015) Standard specification for poly (vinyl chloride) gloves for medical application.

This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification summary for "Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)". It describes the device, its intended use, and the studies conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) films form a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. It's tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure. The Poly (vinyl chloride) glove acts as a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151.

This document pertains to the 510(k) premarket notification for Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored). The information provided heavily focuses on proving substantial equivalence to a predicate device through non-clinical performance data, primarily compliance with established ASTM and ISO standards for medical gloves.

Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) films form a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. It's tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure. The Poly (vinyl chloride) glove acts as a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151.

This document is a 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study proving a novel device meets specific acceptance criteria in a clinical setting.

Therefore, many of the requested sections are not applicable in this context. However, I can extract information related to the device's technical specifications and the non-clinical tests performed to ensure it meets established safety and performance standards for gloves.

Here's a breakdown of the relevant information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are generally defined by compliance with established ASTM and ISO standards for medical examination gloves. The reported device performance is presented as meeting these standards.

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

The proposed device is Powder Free Examination Gloves. The proposed device is Clear (non-colored). The proposed device is non-sterile.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text, focusing on what's available and noting what's not:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

PVC films form a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. It's tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure. The Poly (vinyl chloride) glove acts as a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151.

This document, K182575, is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for "Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)". As such, it does not contain the type of acceptance criteria and study data typically associated with a "device" in the context of an AI/ML medical device, which would involve performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and a detailed human-in-the-loop (HITL) study.

This submission is for a Class I medical device (patient examination glove), which, by regulation, has a much lower bar for demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The "performance data" here refers to physical and biological characteristics of the glove, not diagnostic or predictive performance.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format of AI/ML device studies because the provided document does not pertain to such a device. The "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in this context refer to manufacturing and material standards, not clinical diagnostic accuracy.

However, I can extract the information relevant to this specific device type and its "studies":

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (for a physical medical device: Examination Glove)

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a non-sterile disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

PVC films form a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. Its tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure. The Poly (vinyl chloride) glove acts as a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151.

The provided text is an FDA 510(k) summary for "Kindguard Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)". This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving a medical device's performance against specific clinical efficacy or diagnostic accuracy criteria as would be required for a novel AI/imaging device.

Therefore, many of the requested categories (e.g., sample size for test/training set, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, effect size, type of ground truth) are not applicable to this type of medical device submission. This submission relies on established performance standards for examination gloves.

Here's how the available information from the document applies to your request:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document compares the subject device's performance against established ASTM standards and FDA requirements, as well as against the predicate device.

Ask a specific question about this device

DAIYANG Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a non-sterile disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

The Poly (vinyl chloride) glove acts as a barrier to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the "DAIYANG Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)". It describes the device, its intended use, and a comparison to a predicate device to establish substantial equivalence.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

PVC films form a barrier to body fluids and bloodborne Pathogens. The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. It's tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure. Poly (vinyl chloride) glove is known to create a barrier to bloodborne pathogens and body fluids. ASTM conforming tensile properties create a glove that is strong and flexible. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151 requirements.

The provided document describes the acceptance criteria and the study that proves Daxwell, LLC's Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) meet those criteria, primarily through a comparison to a predicate device and adherence to established ASTM and ISO standards.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device

Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored) is a non-sterile disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

Powder-Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (Non-colored) that meets all of the requirements of ASTM standard D 5250-06(Reaffirmation 2011).
-- How the device functions:
PVC films form a barrier to body fluids and bloodborne Pathogens
-- Scientific concepts that form the basis for the device
The PVC rubber is water tight under normal conditions of use. It's tensile properties cause it to conform to the hand, allowing movements necessary for a medical procedure.
-- Physical and performance characteristics such as design, materials and physical properties:
PVC gloves are known to create a barrier to bloodborne pathogens and body fluids. ASTM conforming tensile properties create a glove that is strong and flexible. The glove is manufactured in accordance with the requirements of ASTM D5250 and ASTM D5151 requirements.

The document describes the acceptance criteria and performance of the "Powder Free Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves, Clear (non-colored)" manufactured by Better Plastic Co., Ltd. against regulatory standards and a predicate device.

Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Study Details:

The document describes a submission for a 510(k) premarket notification, which is a process to demonstrate that the new device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device. The study is a comparison of the subject device's performance against established ASTM standards and the predicate device's characteristics rather than a traditional clinical study with patients.

1. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:

   • The document does not specify a distinct "test set" in the context of a clinical trial or algorithm evaluation. Instead, the "testing" refers to the manufacturing quality control and performance evaluation of the gloves based on established ASTM standards.
   • The data provenance is from non-clinical testing performed by the manufacturer, Better Plastic Co., Ltd. The country of origin for the manufacturing and testing is China, as indicated by the submitter's address. The data is prospective in the sense that it's generated for the submission of this specific device.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

   • This question is not applicable to this type of device and submission. "Ground truth" in the context of diagnostic AI or image analysis typically refers to definitively confirmed diagnoses by expert clinicians, pathology, or long-term outcomes. For patient examination gloves, the "truth" is whether they meet specified physical, chemical, and biological performance standards (e.g., tensile strength, freedom from pinholes, biocompatibility). These are evaluated through standardized laboratory tests, not by human expert consensus on a diagnostic outcome.

3. Adjudication method for the test set:

   • Not applicable. The "adjudication" for this product involves laboratory testing against defined standards. There is no human observer consensus or adjudication required beyond verifying that the test results meet the specified criteria.

4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

   • Not applicable. This is a medical device (patient examination gloves), not an AI diagnostic imaging tool or a system that involves human "readers" or AI assistance.

5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

   • Not applicable. This device is not an algorithm or AI system. Its performance is evaluated through physical and chemical testing.

6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

   • The "ground truth" for this device's performance is defined by adherence to established international and national standards for patient examination gloves, specifically:
     • ASTM D5250-06 (Reaffirmation 2011): Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Gloves for Medical Application.
     • ASTM D5151-06 (Reapproved 2011): Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves.
     • ASTM D6124-06 (Reaffirmation 2011): Standard Test Method for Residual Powder on Medical Gloves.
     • 21 CFR 800.20: General requirements for medical devices.
     • ISO 10993-10 Third Edition 2010-08-01: Biological evaluation of medical devices -- Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization.
   • The testing also focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device (K120968) which presumably met these same standards.

7. The sample size for the training set:

   • Not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of this device. The manufacturing process is controlled, and samples are taken for quality assurance testing against the standards. This is not an AI/ML product that learns from a training dataset.

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

   • Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device. The performance standards are established by consensus national and international bodies (e.g., ASTM, ISO, FDA regulations) for medical devices of this type.

Ask a specific question about this device