Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K024338
    Date Cleared
    2003-03-03

    (66 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    A vinyl patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    POWDER-FREE VINYL EXAM GLOVES WITH ALOE COATING INSIDE

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided document, there is no information available regarding the acceptance criteria or any study that proves the device meets specific performance criteria. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Powder-Free Vinyl Examination Gloves with Aloe Coating Inside."

    The letter primarily focuses on:

    • Substantial Equivalence Determination: Stating that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
    • Regulatory Classification: Identifying the device as Class I and subject to general controls.
    • Compliance with Regulations: Reminding the manufacturer of their responsibility to comply with various FDA regulations (e.g., registration, listing, labeling, good manufacturing practices).
    • Indications for Use Statement: Defining the intended use of the glove.

    There is no mention of:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    • Sample sizes, data provenance, number or qualifications of experts, or adjudication methods for any test set.
    • Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies or standalone algorithm performance.
    • Types of ground truth used.
    • Sample size for training sets or how ground truth for training was established.

    This type of FDA clearance (510(k)) typically relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, often through performance testing detailed in the submission, but the letter itself does not contain the specifics of those tests or their results.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1